<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Just A Theory &#187; Space &amp; Astronomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justatheory.co.uk/category/space-and-astronomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justatheory.co.uk</link>
	<description>Our thoughts on science and its relationship with the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:10:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Roundup: Pac-Man and Physics World edition</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/04/04/weekly-roundup-pac-man-and-physics-world-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/04/04/weekly-roundup-pac-man-and-physics-world-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 13:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Aron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About Just A Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mimas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pac-man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pac-Man in the moon Mimas is fast shaping up to be the nerdiest object in the solar system. The tiny moon of Saturn has already been compared to the Death Star from Star Wars, but the Cassini probe has revealed another geek-culture icon &#8211; Pac-Man. Nom nom nom The appearance of the classic video game [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pac-Man in the moon</strong></p>
<p>Mimas is fast shaping up to be the nerdiest object in the solar system. The tiny moon of Saturn has already been compared to the <a href="http://www.usm.maine.edu/planet/mimas_deathstar.gif">Death Star from Star Wars</a>, but the Cassini probe has revealed another geek-culture icon &#8211; <a href="http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/newsreleases/newsrelease20100329/">Pac-Man</a>.</p>
<div class="img aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2978" style="width:500px;">
	<img src="http://justatheory.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/pacMan640w1-500x253.jpg" alt="Nom nom nom" width="500" height="253" />
	<div>Nom nom nom</div>
</div>
<p>The appearance of the classic video game character during a thermal scan of Mimas has baffled scientists. It could be due to differences in texture on the moon&#8217;s icey surface. Old, densely packed ice conducts heat away from the surface, while recently fallen snow acts as an insulator, trapping heat to create the distinctive Pac-Man shape.</p>
<p><strong>Just A Review: Just A Theory</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://physicsworld.com/">Physics World</a> has published a rather <a href="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/42138">nice review</a> of Just A Theory. You&#8217;ll have to register on their site to see it in full, but here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Just A Theory offers a moderately UK-centric perspective on science news for interested members of the public and busy professional researchers alike. You will not find too many detailed, hard-science articles here, but sometimes that is not the point. As a student or professional physicist, it is easy to develop tunnel vision as you dig ever deeper into a relatively narrow research topic, but keeping the “bigger picture” in sight can be a time-consuming process in an ever-more-crowded media world. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/04/04/weekly-roundup-pac-man-and-physics-world-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s space programme turns to mothers</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/09/chinas-space-programme-turns-to-mothers/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/09/chinas-space-programme-turns-to-mothers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronauts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmic rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar storms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday details emerged that China has selected its next generation of astronauts; a crew of five men and two women. However, to be one of those two women, recruiters demanded a rather unusual qualification, motherhood. The Chinese space programme is known to be stringent in its selection of potential astronauts; even bad breath can shatter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday details emerged that China has selected its next generation of astronauts; a crew of five men and two women. However, to be one of those two women, recruiters demanded a rather unusual qualification, motherhood.</p>
<p>The Chinese space programme is known to be stringent in its selection of potential astronauts; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/03/china-astronaut-search-bad-breath" target="_blank">even bad breath can shatter your chances</a>. However, this requirement for maternity doesn’t stem from an inferred ability of mothers to better cope with the gruelling conditions of space. Instead China fear for what damage space-based radiation might inflict on a would-be female astronaut’s ability to have children in the first place.</p>
<p>Xu Xianrong, an expert at the air force general hospital, is quoted on the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/08/china-mothers-space-astronauts" target="_blank">Guardian website</a> as saying of the unique approach,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s out of the consideration of being responsible for the female pilots. Though there is little evidence on how the space experience will affect the female constitution, we have to be extra cautious. After all, it&#8217;s unprecedented in China.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Such things may be unprecedented in China, but the radiation dangers experienced when leaving the protective cocoon of the Earth have long been considered.</p>
<p>There are two main types of radiation that can cause damage to space travelers, high energy particles from the Sun, and cosmic rays arriving from the galaxy beyond. For those of us on the Earth’s surface our planet’s atmosphere and magnetic field duly shield us from these potential dangers. However, those in space can be hit with their full force, particularly when venturing to places like the Moon, which has neither a magnetic field nor an atmosphere.</p>
<p>In fact, the Apollo astronauts of the late 60’s and early 70’s <a href="http://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/books/apollo/S2ch3.htm" target="_blank">knew full well</a> the risks that an event like a solar storm could unleash and they travelled to the Moon anyway, albeit keeping mission length to a premium to narrow the risks. Such a storm would rain high energy particles upon the unprotected astronauts, penetrating their skin and ripping apart the DNA in their cells. Cosmic rays, coming from outside the solar system, represent a longer term threat; it is thought they could cause illnesses ranging from cancer to cataracts.</p>
<p>Clearly these doses of radiation harm both men and women alike, what is unclear are the effect such doses would have on female fertility. What is looking increasingly clear, particularly with <a href="http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/28/one-small-misstep-for-obama-one-giant-mistake-for-mankind/" target="_blank">President Obama’s recent cancellation of NASA’s Constellation programme</a>, is that the next feet to scuff the lunar dust will be Chinese. If such feet happen to be female, then their obligatory offspring would be rightly proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/09/chinas-space-programme-turns-to-mothers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chilean earthquake makes the day shorter</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/02/chilean-earthquake-makes-the-day-shorter/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/02/chilean-earthquake-makes-the-day-shorter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chilean earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth rotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The devastating earthquake which struck Chile on February 27th may well have had an effect on the rotation of the Earth itself according to a NASA scientist. Richard Gross of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory has used computer models to calculate that our day is now about 1.26 microseconds shorter than it was on February 26th. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The devastating earthquake which struck Chile on February 27th may well have had an effect on the rotation of the Earth itself according to a NASA scientist. Richard Gross of the <a href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/">Jet Propulsion Laboratory</a> has used computer models to calculate that our day is now about <a href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2010-071&amp;rn=news.xml&amp;rst=2504">1.26 microseconds shorter</a> than it was on February 26th.</p>
<p>A small amount and yet it serves as a reminder that whilst we have exactly twenty four hours in our standard day, this never quite matches the actual rotation period of the Earth. Back in 1999 Gross published a <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/2014/18309">paper</a> in <em>Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors</em> in which he modeled the spin of the Earth from 1832 to 1997. The shortest day on record was apparently August 2nd 2004 whereas the longest day was sometime during 1912, the year the Titanic sank.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The annual changes in the length of the day are caused mostly by the atmosphere &#8211; changes in the strength and direction of the winds, especially the jet stream. The Sun warms the equator more than the poles. That temperature difference is largely responsible for the jet stream. Seasonal changes in that temperature difference cause changes in the winds and, hence, the length of the day,&#8221; says Gross.</p></blockquote>
<p>More significant events, like those in Chile, can enhance this process. The quake, which measured 8.8 on the magnitude scale, is also likely to have knocked the Earth&#8217;s axis slightly out of its previous alignment by about 2.7 milliarcseconds (roughly 3 one thousandths of one 3600th of a degree) or the equivalent of about seven centimetres.</p>
<p>Whilst this might not sound significant, knowing the precise alignment of the Earth is crucial for many modern day technologies such as GPS. And in an age where solar system exploration is on the increase, knowing the precise location of the Earth&#8217;s orientation with respect to these craft is a fundamental part of planning successful interplanetary maneuvers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/02/chilean-earthquake-makes-the-day-shorter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists launch Solar Stormwatch to ask public for help in understanding the Sun</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/01/scientists-launch-solar-stormwatch-to-ask-public-for-help-in-understanding-the-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/01/scientists-launch-solar-stormwatch-to-ask-public-for-help-in-understanding-the-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coronal Mass Ejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar storm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar storms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar stormwatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solarstormwatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEREO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Royal Observatory, Greenwich (ROG), in partnership with the STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory and Zooniverse are launching Solar Stormwatch, a new web project where anyone can help spot and track solar storms and be involved in the latest solar research. The Sun is much more dynamic than it appears in our sky. Intense magnetic fields [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nmm.ac.uk/places/royal-observatory/">The Royal Observatory, Greenwich (ROG)</a>, in partnership with the <a href="http://www.scitech.ac.uk/About/Conts/Find/RAL/Introduction.aspx">STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory</a> and <a href="http://www.zooniverse.org">Zooniverse</a> are launching <a href="http://www.solarstormwatch.com">Solar Stormwatch</a>, a new web project where anyone can help spot and track solar storms and be involved in the latest solar research.</p>
<p>The Sun is much more dynamic than it appears in our sky. Intense magnetic fields churn and pummel the Sun’s atmosphere and they store enormous amounts of energy that, when released, hurl billions of tons of material out into space in explosions called Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) – or solar storms. </p>
<p>Solar Stormwatch volunteers can spot these storms and track their progress across space towards the Earth. Such storms can be harmful to astronauts in orbit and have the potential to knock out communication satellites, disrupt mobile phone networks and damage power lines. With the public’s help, Solar Stormwatch will allow solar scientists to better understand these potentially dangerous storms and help to forecast their arrival time at Earth.</p>
<p>Julia Wilkinson, a Solar Stormwatch user says, </p>
<blockquote><p>“The fact that any Solar Stormwatch volunteer could make a brand new discovery about our neighbouring star is very cool indeed. All you need is a computer and an interest in finding out more about what the sun is really like.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Dr. Chris Davis, one of the STFC scientists behind Solar Stormwatch says of the project,</p>
<blockquote><p>“The more people who can take part in Solar Stormwatch, the more we will know about solar storms. Collective measurements by many people are worth much more than the subjective opinion of one person.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The project uses real data from NASA’s STEREO spacecraft, a pair of satellites in orbit around the Sun which give scientists a constant eye on the ever-changing solar surface. The UK has a major input in STEREO, providing the two widest-field instruments, the Heliospheric Imagers, which provide Solar Stormwatch with its data. Each imager has two cameras helping STEREO stare across the 150 million kilometres from the Earth to the Sun. </p>
<p>Solar Stormwatch is the latest chapter in a long history of solar research at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, dating back to the 1870’s, when the Observatory housed a photoheliograph, a telescope that took daily photos of the Sun to track sunspots. Visitors will be able to see this telescope again when the Altazimuth Pavilion at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, reopens in March 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/03/01/scientists-launch-solar-stormwatch-to-ask-public-for-help-in-understanding-the-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Roundup: Video edition</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/31/weekly-roundup-video-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/31/weekly-roundup-video-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Aron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventions & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Roundup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chimp cinema Earlier this week the BBC broadcast the first ever film shot entirely by chimpanzees: The acting isn&#8217;t that great, and the special effects are terrible, but it&#8217;s still more interesting than some of the rubbish churned out by Hollywood! The film was part of a scientific study investigating how chimps perceive the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chimp cinema</strong></p>
<p>Earlier this week the BBC broadcast the first ever film shot entirely by chimpanzees:</p>
<p><object class="aligncenter" width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RH4_2IZ3vb8&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RH4_2IZ3vb8&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>The acting isn&#8217;t that great, and the special effects are terrible, but it&#8217;s still more interesting than some of the rubbish churned out by Hollywood! The film was part of a scientific study <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8472000/8472831.stm">investigating how chimps perceive the world around them.</a></p>
<p><strong>Mars movies</strong></p>
<p>Although it seems we&#8217;re <a href="http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/28/one-small-misstep-for-obama-one-giant-mistake-for-mankind/">probably not going to step foot Mars</a> any time soon, you can go there virtually today. Doug Ellison, founder of <a href="http://unmannedspaceflight.com/">UnmannedSpaceflight.com</a>, has used data from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to recreate a faithfully recreated flyby of the Martian surface:</p>
<p><object class="aligncenter" width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fp8WU05W0Jg&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fp8WU05W0Jg&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>See more on his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/unmannedspaceflight">YouTube page</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Magnets&#8230;in space!</strong></p>
<p>Have you ever wondered how magnets work in zero gravity? &#8220;Very well,&#8221; is the answer, according to video game developer/astronaut <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Garriott">Richard Garriot</a>:</p>
<p><object class="aligncenter" width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_Bfr5i_92bA&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_Bfr5i_92bA&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/31/weekly-roundup-video-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One small misstep for Obama, one giant mistake for mankind</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/28/one-small-misstep-for-obama-one-giant-mistake-for-mankind/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/28/one-small-misstep-for-obama-one-giant-mistake-for-mankind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Aron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting It Wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumours are circulating that President Obama plans to scrap NASA&#8217;s new generation of rockets. It&#8217;s been leaked that his budget next Monday won&#8217;t include cash for the Constellation program, a series of spacecraft designed to replace the ageing Shuttle, and return us to the moon by 2020. If that&#8217;s true, I&#8217;m incredibly disappointed. I understand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumours are <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/os-no-moon-for-nasa-20100126,0,2770904.story">circulating</a> that President Obama plans to scrap NASA&#8217;s new generation of rockets. It&#8217;s been leaked that his budget next Monday won&#8217;t include cash for the Constellation program, a series of spacecraft designed to replace the ageing Shuttle, and return us to the moon by 2020.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s true, I&#8217;m incredibly disappointed. I understand that in a time of global economic turbulence, space exploration may not be Obama&#8217;s top priority, but his new vision for NASA seems incredibly short-sighted. </p>
<p>Instead of &#8220;boldy going&#8221;, astronauts will spend another ten years floating around the International Space Station. NASA will concentrate on Earth-based projects &#8211; mostly climate change related &#8211; and private companies will take over the Space Shuttle&#8217;s job of ferrying cargo in to orbit. The moon and Mars will just have to wait, it seems.</p>
<p>This worries me, but not because of some romantic idea of humans exploring the final frontier &#8211; my concerns are far more practical. I believe getting off Earth and colonising other planets is essential for the continuation of the human race. At the moment we&#8217;ve got all eggs in the proverbial basket &#8211; if an asteroid were to strike Earth, it could potentially wipe us out completely. Colonisation simply spreads the risk.</p>
<p>Building a base on the moon and then eventually Mars would not only be an incredible feat of human ingenuity, but also a kind of species-wide insurance policy. It&#8217;s a project that would take decades, and unfortunately politicians only think in four-year terms. I understand that Obama is under attack because of his healthcare plans, and the budget has to be balanced somehow, but cutting Constellation isn&#8217;t the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/28/one-small-misstep-for-obama-one-giant-mistake-for-mankind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Roundup: Tube, time, and terrible edition</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/24/weekly-roundup-tube-time-and-terrible-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/24/weekly-roundup-tube-time-and-terrible-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Aron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting It Wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milky Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear, one week in and I&#8217;m already off schedule. Two words: food poisoning. Leftover Chinese food can be deadly! On with this week&#8217;s roundup: Next stop, outer space Even London natives can struggle with the complicated spiderweb that is the Tube map, but surprisingly enough it is actually intended to simplify getting about the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, one week in and I&#8217;m already off schedule. Two words: food poisoning. Leftover Chinese food can be deadly! On with this week&#8217;s roundup:</p>
<p><strong>Next stop, outer space</strong></p>
<p>Even London natives can struggle with the complicated spiderweb that is the Tube map, but surprisingly enough it is actually intended to simplify getting about the capital. Inspired by its iconic design, Harvard scientist <a href="http://www.arbesman.net">Samuel Arbesman</a> developed a similar map for getting about the Milky Way:</p>
<div class="img aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2891" style="width:500px;">
	<img src="http://justatheory.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/article-1244706-07EF0770000005DC-213_634x4291-500x338.jpg" alt="But where is Morington Crescent?" width="500" height="338" />
	<div>But where is Morington Crescent?</div>
</div>
<p>The coloured lines correspond to an arm of the spiral galaxy, and each stop is a star or other astronomical object. </p>
<p><strong>Mental time travel</strong></p>
<p>You won&#8217;t be journeying to the age of the dinosaurs just yet, but psychologists at the University of Aberdeen have discovered a strange form of <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-01/afps-mtt012110.php">time travel</a>. Apparently thinking about the past or future causes people to move backwards or forwards. The researchers suggest behaviour could be the origin of temporal metaphors such as future = forward and past = backward.</p>
<p><strong>Bond. Strange Bond.</strong></p>
<p>The Royal Society of Chemistry continued it&#8217;s tradition of strange PR stunts this week by announcing a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7047457/Scientists-launch-search-to-find-Sean-Connery-lookalike.html">search for a Sean Connery lookalike</a>. </p>
<p>As if <a href="http://justatheory.co.uk/2008/11/07/royal-society-of-chemistry-i-think-we-need-to-talk/">devising a new ending for the Italian Job</a> or <a href="http://justatheory.co.uk/2008/11/16/weekly-roundup-silly-society-bizarre-bot-and-confusing-creationism-edition/">cooking the perfect Yorkshire pudding</a> weren&#8217;t enough, they want to use the lookalike in a bizarre photoshoot designed to highlight the importance of British research keeping the nation healthy. No, I don&#8217;t get it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2010/01/24/weekly-roundup-tube-time-and-terrible-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cassini snaps a Titanic reflection</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/12/18/cassini-snaps-a-titanic-reflection/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/12/18/cassini-snaps-a-titanic-reflection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cassini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NASA have released a photo of sunlight glinting off a lake on Titan, Saturn&#8217;s largest moon. The image, snapped by the Cassini space probe, confirmed liquid in the Northern hemisphere to add to the discovery of liquid lakes in the Southern Hemisphere in 2008. Sunlight reflecting off a lake on Titan This part of Titan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA have released a photo of sunlight glinting off a lake on Titan, Saturn&#8217;s largest moon. The image, snapped by the Cassini space probe, confirmed liquid in the Northern hemisphere to add to the <a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/30/liquid-lake-on-titan-confirmed/">discovery of liquid lakes</a> in the Southern Hemisphere in 2008.</p>
<div class="img aligncenter size-full wp-image-2856" style="width:516px;">
	<img src="http://justatheory.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/TitanReflection.jpg" alt="Sunlight reflecting off a lake on Titan" width="516" height="516" />
	<div>Sunlight reflecting off a lake on Titan</div>
</div>
<p>This part of Titan has been shrouded in darkness for the last 15 years as the moon&#8217;s North pole was angled away from the Sun, but as Saturn approached it&#8217;s equinox the lake in question slowly titled into the Sun&#8217;s glare. </p>
<p>A clever piece of detective work has pinned down the lake responsible as Kraken Mare, an enormous body of water stretching 400,000 square kilometres across Titan. </p>
<p>Titan is one of the most exciting places in our Solar System, particularly when it comes to finding life, and this discovery further adds to the wealth of information scientists are collecting about the planet-sized satellite. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/12/18/cassini-snaps-a-titanic-reflection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Roundup: I&#8217;ve been busy edition</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/11/22/weekly-roundup-ive-been-busy-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/11/22/weekly-roundup-ive-been-busy-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Aron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getting It Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventions & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A busy week has meant a pretty poor showing on Just A Theory, but hopefully a packed roundup will make up for it: LHC a-go-go The Large Hadron Collider is finally up and running again! As our CERN correspondent Emma mentioned last month, scientist in Geneva have been working on restarting the LHC after it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A busy week has meant a pretty poor showing on Just A Theory, but hopefully a packed roundup will make up for it:</p>
<p><strong>LHC a-go-go</strong></p>
<p>The Large Hadron Collider is finally <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8372737.stm">up and running again</a>! As our CERN correspondent Emma <a href="http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/10/17/exciting-times-in-geneva/">mentioned last month</a>, scientist in Geneva have been working on restarting the LHC after it had to be shut down last year. Their hard work paid off on Friday, and proton beams are now successfully colliding in the 27km-long ring of the world&#8217;s largest experiment. Now for the science!</p>
<p><strong>What if the Earth had rings?</strong></p>
<p>Speaking of rings, check out this short video showing how it would look if Earth had its own set, like Saturn. </p>
<p><object class="aligncenter" width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SNCBh2MLvdw&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SNCBh2MLvdw&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>At the equator they appear to be a thin line through the sky, but further north or south they make an amazing sight, lighting up the sky even at night. Anyway we can build these things and cover them in solar panels or something?</p>
<p><strong>Field less players to win the World Cup</strong></p>
<p>It seems that having a large squad to choose from can actually be a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/6591020/Fewer-players-secret-to-World-Cup-success.html">hindrance</a> when it comes to top football. You might think fielding substitutions lets mangers pick the best players for every situation, but research shows that sticking with the top 11 is the key to success.</p>
<p><strong>Bacteria that can detect landmines</strong></p>
<p>Scientist at the University of Edinburgh have developed a strain of bacteria that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/8362066.stm">glow green near explosives</a>. By mixing them with a colourless solution, they can be sprayed from the air on to suspected landmine fields, turning the ground green if mines are detected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/11/22/weekly-roundup-ive-been-busy-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gordon Brown cheaply shrugs off Campaign For Dark Skies</title>
		<link>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/10/28/gordon-brown-cheaply-shrugs-off-campaign-for-dark-skies/</link>
		<comments>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/10/28/gordon-brown-cheaply-shrugs-off-campaign-for-dark-skies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting It Wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Ainsworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Dark Skies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Heathcoat-Amory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Year of Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Drayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nimrod XV230]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Minister's Questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justatheory.co.uk/?p=2677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I was getting ready to leave my flat for my afternoon shift when, hurrying to finish my lunch, I managed to catch the very end of Prime Minister’s Question Time (PMQs) on the TV. The twelfth and final question was asked by the Conservative member for Wells, David Heathcoat-Amory, and this is what he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I was getting ready to leave my flat for my afternoon shift when, hurrying to finish my lunch, I managed to catch the very end of Prime Minister’s Question Time (PMQs) on the TV.</p>
<p>The twelfth and final question was asked by the Conservative member for Wells, David Heathcoat-Amory, and this is what he had to say:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm/cmtoday/cmdebate/02.htm#hddr_3"></p>
<blockquote><p>
“As the Prime Minister knows, this is the International Year of Astronomy. Does he therefore support the Campaign for Dark Skies, which is good for astronomy and also saves energy? If he does, will he play his part by turning off—or at least dimming—the lights in public buildings, including Downing Street, where all the lights are on very late into the night?”
</p></blockquote>
<p></a></p>
<p>As someone who is passionate about astronomy my ears immediately pricked up and I was momentarily diverted from my Marmite sandwiches. Did I really just hear a question on astronomy asked in the House of Commons? Really? Well this was our learned Prime Minster’s response:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm/cmtoday/cmdebate/02.htm#hddr_3"></p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;I thought that the right hon. Gentleman was going to complain about European regulations, because that is normally what he does. All of us have a responsibility to save electricity and all Government Departments and all parts of government should be involved in doing so.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p></a></p>
<p>What a bullshit answer. Now I’m the first to admit that this question wasn’t the most pressing matter of the day. There had already been questions on the Afghan election, the Lockerbie disaster and climate change, far more important than whether you can adequately star spot. </p>
<p>However, Gordy barely even answered the question instead using it to score cheap points against the Opposition. The token answer of “all of us have a responsibility blah blah blah blah” was about as satisfying as my Marmite sandwiches. He might as well have said piss off lets all go for some lunch.</p>
<p>And this is the great problem; there are too few advocates of science in Government. Regular <em>Just a Theory</em> readers will recall my <a href="http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/07/21/update-on-the-lord-drayson-debate/">ongoing debate</a> with Labour peer and Science Minister Lord Drayson (which I am happy to say is going to happen with the next month or so). Despite my well documented grievances, Lord Drayson is really on science’s side and we should continue to hope for more of his ilk.</p>
<p>So, having seemingly ranted for eight paragraphs thus far I feel I should tell you the premise behind <a href="http://www.britastro.org/dark-skies/index.html"><em>Campaign for Dark Skies</em></a>. The essence is that there is so much wasteful light thrown up into the night sky that the skylines of most major UK cities are horribly hued a kind of murky orange. This limits the glory of the night sky to around 50-100 stars rather than the normal 1500 that should visible from these shores.</p>
<p>Jacob <a href="http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/10/25/weekly-roundup-animal-pictures-and-carbon-predictions-edition/">blogged</a> earlier in the week about the <a href="http://trillionthtonne.org/">Trillionth Tonne</a>, a website counting the cost of our inability to tackle climate change. In his post he called the ever increasing figure “sobering to watch”. Equally the <em>Campaign for Dark Skies</em> have a counter clocking up the amount of money wasted due to street lamps showering some of their light up into the sky rather than down where we need it.</p>
<p>In fact, <a href="http://www.britastro.org/dark-skies/economic.html?0O">the counter</a> ticks along at £4 a second, which means since the 1st January 2009 the UK has wasted over £100 million on electric lights that serve no purpose whatsoever. And that is just street lights. The full estimate, including business and  industrial based lighting, is likely to be over £1 BILLION. I’m not even going to argue the astronomical perspective on this one. Yes you would be able to see more stars but £100 million pounds, or more likely £1 BILLION, is just a pointless waste our <em>OUR</em> money.</p>
<p>This comes on a day when after PMQ’s, Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth stood before Parliament and detailed a report suggesting MOD cost cutting <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8329117.stm">led to the deaths of 14 service personnel</a> in a Nimrod crash in 2006. Ainsworth said that, </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;in our pursuit of financial savings the MoD and the RAF allowed their focus on safety to suffer. We accept this with regard to the Nimrod XV230”</p></blockquote>
<p>Don’t get me wrong I am not blaming the deaths of those 14 servicemen on wasteful street lighting. However what really gets my goat is that when a valid science question that could save our economy upwards of £1 billion is actually asked in Parliament, and on a day when the Government is held to account for its penny pinching, that our dearest PM shits all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justatheory.co.uk/2009/10/28/gordon-brown-cheaply-shrugs-off-campaign-for-dark-skies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

