Archive for the ‘Biology’ Category


Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 30 May 2010 at 4:31 pm by Mia Kukathasan
In Biology, Evolution

Male crickets that grow up surrounded by the songs of many potential competitors, grow up bigger and stronger than counterparts reared in silence. It seems that the sound of masculine chirps ends up masculinising young crickets within hearing range.

Researchers from The University of California, Riverside, measured the testicular tissue mass of young male crickets that had been played cricket song, and found that they grew up to have nearly 10% more testicular mass than the youths without such auditory cues of competition. A big part of the male crickets’ mating strategy involves a long-range call. The song can be ‘parasitized’ by other males, who lurk nearby, taking credit for the masculine calls to impress arriving females. But, the males that grew up surrounded by the songs of other males were less likely to use such underhand tactics. Instead they were generally bigger, noisier and in overall better shape.

It seems mating matters to crickets, in fact so fixated are decorated crickets that they will sacrifice their health to impress the females. As part of the mating process, males offer their mates an adorably named ‘nuptial food gift’, a gummy blobby concoction that they synthesize and transfer to the females along with sperm. Scientists from Illinois State University managed to coerce some decorated crickets into producing larger food packages, which they did, despite it lowering their immune systems.

After all that effort, when the deed has been done, mating mission accomplished, there’s still no guarantee that the sperm that entered the female cricket will be the sperm that fertilises her eggs. Of course some of it will be, but with the promiscuity of female crickets, and the aggressive mating tactics of males, multiple matings with the same female are common. So, who becomes the daddy?

Researchers from Exeter university found that even after mating with up to ten males, promiscuous female field crickets can control the amount of sperm that they store from each mate, regardless of the order they mated in. Although crickets don’t avoid mating with relatives, they do reduce the chances of producing unfit inbred offspring, by using their abdominal muscles to keep hold of more of the sperm from unrelated males. Scientists from Australia and Switerland went further and found that a male’s chances of fathering “increases with its attractiveness and decreases with the size of the female”.

In the harsh world of insect reproduction, once the eggs have been laid, the little ones are on their own. Although the mothers don’t stick around, researchers at the University of South Carolina Upstate, have found that they can leave hidden maternal messages in their unborn babies, to prepare them for the harsh realities of existence. Storm and Lima (researchers, with names like comic superheros), placed pregnant crickets in enclosures with predatory wolf spiders whose fangs were tipped with wax. This meant the spiders could stalk the crickets, make them extremely frightened, but not actually kill them.

The offspring of mothers born to the spider-stalked mothers were faster to react to the danger of predators, than the control offspring from mothers kept more cushy circumstances. These offspring of ‘stalked’ mothers ran for cover more quickly and stayed in hiding for more than twice as long. They would also freeze when coming across signs of their predators, signs such as spider silk or spider faeces. Having this fear, unsurprisingly meant that they ended up with higher survival rates.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
3 Comments » Posted on Sunday 9 May 2010 at 6:23 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Climate Change & Environment, Getting It Wrong, Health & Medicine, Weekly Roundup

Who needs facts?

We all know that science can be complicated and confusing, but don’t let that get you down – Fake Science is here to straighten everything out. Did you know that the periodic table is actually based on Scrabble, or that wind power uses giant fans to make wind? Science has never been so simple.

Want to lose weight? Keep it off your plate

Simply leaving serving dishes on the kitchen counter rather than bringing them to the dining table reduces the amount of food you eat, say researchers at Cornell University. They found that this simple dieting strategy reduces the temptation of second helpings, cutting the number of calories people consumed by 20%.

Brian Wansink, director of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab, said that the same idea can be used to promote healthier foods over sugary snacks – keeping fruit on display makes you more likely to eat it instead of reaching for a piece of cake in the fridge.

Animal privacy? Not in my backyard

Wildlife documentaries infringe an animal’s right to privacy, says Brett Mills, a lecturer in film studies at the University of East Anglia:

“We have an assumption that humans have some right to privacy, so why do we not assume that for other species, particularly when they are engaging in behaviour that suggests they don’t want to be seen?”

I’m a staunch defender of civil liberties, but even I think extending the right to privacy to animals is going a bit too far. Of course, great care should be taken to avoid distributing their natural habits or causing them distress, but I really don’t think animals mind us watching them doing what they do.

Green tax would hurt the poorest

A proposed tax on carbon footprints would hit the poorest households hardest, according to study from the University of Leeds. The carbon tax would cost low earners 6% of their annual income, while the richest households would only pay around 2%.

The difference is the result of poorer households spending more on costs such as heating and electricity – 40% of their income, compared to just 8% for high earners.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 25 April 2010 at 7:25 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Health & Medicine, Inventions & Technology, Weekly Roundup, Yes, But When?

Print your own skin

Researchers funded by the US military are working on a way of printing new human skin as a treatment for burn victims. What’s more, they’ve using a regular inkjet printer and cartridges filled with human skill cells:

Grow your own font

Typographer Craig Ward has developed a typeface with a difference – each letter was grown from live cells and moulded into the correct shape.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Thursday 8 April 2010 at 7:14 am by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Psychology

Guest blog time! My fellow Imperial alumni Mia Kukathasan tells us how mice show some people may have depressive tendencies in our genes. Look out for more from Mia soon…

Scientists have genetically engineered mice with a predisposition for depression. The study aims to find out why, when faced with stressful situations, some people’s are genetically more prone to fall to depression. The mice were altered to carry a genetic change that affects serotonin transport in the brain, mimicking a change that occurs in people with the condition.

“There is a clear relationship between a short form of the serotonin transporter and a very high vulnerability to develop clinical depression when people are exposed to increasing levels of stressful life events.” says Dr. Allesandro Bartolomucci of Parma university, Italy.

Brain imaging of people with depression shows that they have greater activity in some brain areas, but the link with genetics is not as well understood. Chemical changes could be seen in these ‘knock’out’ mice in areas of the brain that regulate memory formation, emotional responses to stimuli and social interactions, such as meeting new mice. They showed physical signs of stress with changes in body temperature, body weight gain, higher levels of the ’stress’ hormone corticosterone and lower levels of the ‘feel good’ hormone serotonin.

Depression is the number one cause of ‘disability’ worldwide, according to the World Health Organisation with 120 million people affected globally. The increased risk of hormone imbalances, heart disease, digestive problems and reduced immune response faced by depressed people makes it a formidable foe for the health services. The work from this study will help to find out how this genetic change in people affects serotonin turnover in the brain. The results published in the journal Disease Models and Mechanisms suggest that the genetic mutation causes an exaggerated response to stress.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
1 Comment » Posted on Thursday 18 March 2010 at 9:15 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Evolution

Man’s best friend was likely born in the Middle East, according to a paper published this week in Nature. A genetic analysis of 85 dog breeds revealed they have more in common with wolves from countries like Israel, Saudi Arabia and Iran then in any other part of the world.

An international team of scientists lead by the University of California, Los Angeles compared genetic data from more than 900 dogs and 200 wolves to create a “family tree” that shows the connections between the various breeds. Previous research suggested that dogs originated in East Asia, but that was based only on genetic changes in mitochondria, tiny structures found in all animal cells. This new work examines a much larger section of the canine genome, comparing 48,000 different locations across species DNA.

Dogs and wolves are all connected.
Dogs and wolves are all connected.
Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
3 Comments » Posted on Tuesday 9 March 2010 at 4:47 pm by Colin Stuart
In Biology, Space & Astronomy

Yesterday details emerged that China has selected its next generation of astronauts; a crew of five men and two women. However, to be one of those two women, recruiters demanded a rather unusual qualification, motherhood.

The Chinese space programme is known to be stringent in its selection of potential astronauts; even bad breath can shatter your chances. However, this requirement for maternity doesn’t stem from an inferred ability of mothers to better cope with the gruelling conditions of space. Instead China fear for what damage space-based radiation might inflict on a would-be female astronaut’s ability to have children in the first place.

Xu Xianrong, an expert at the air force general hospital, is quoted on the Guardian website as saying of the unique approach,

“It’s out of the consideration of being responsible for the female pilots. Though there is little evidence on how the space experience will affect the female constitution, we have to be extra cautious. After all, it’s unprecedented in China.”

Such things may be unprecedented in China, but the radiation dangers experienced when leaving the protective cocoon of the Earth have long been considered.

There are two main types of radiation that can cause damage to space travelers, high energy particles from the Sun, and cosmic rays arriving from the galaxy beyond. For those of us on the Earth’s surface our planet’s atmosphere and magnetic field duly shield us from these potential dangers. However, those in space can be hit with their full force, particularly when venturing to places like the Moon, which has neither a magnetic field nor an atmosphere.

In fact, the Apollo astronauts of the late 60’s and early 70’s knew full well the risks that an event like a solar storm could unleash and they travelled to the Moon anyway, albeit keeping mission length to a premium to narrow the risks. Such a storm would rain high energy particles upon the unprotected astronauts, penetrating their skin and ripping apart the DNA in their cells. Cosmic rays, coming from outside the solar system, represent a longer term threat; it is thought they could cause illnesses ranging from cancer to cataracts.

Clearly these doses of radiation harm both men and women alike, what is unclear are the effect such doses would have on female fertility. What is looking increasingly clear, particularly with President Obama’s recent cancellation of NASA’s Constellation programme, is that the next feet to scuff the lunar dust will be Chinese. If such feet happen to be female, then their obligatory offspring would be rightly proud.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 28 February 2010 at 4:36 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Weekly Roundup

My blogging schedule is all over the place at the moment, but I still have time to bring you some neat things from the world of science:

Chemical party

Chemical reactions can get pretty wild, but I bet you’ve never seen them like this:

Strength in small numbers

Check out this amazing picture of an ant lifting 100 times its body weight – that’s like me hoisting 5 cars at the same time!

This photo won Dr Thomas Endlein of the University of Cambridge Zoology Department first prize in the Biotechnology And Biological Sciences Research Council science photo competition. You can see the other winners on the BBSRC site.

Well, it works for monkeys…

Did you know that learning to climb trees has much in common with the scientific method? This quaint short film explains it all – love the use of Wikipedia as “a source of reliable information”!

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 31 January 2010 at 6:39 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Inventions & Technology, Space & Astronomy, Weekly Roundup

Chimp cinema

Earlier this week the BBC broadcast the first ever film shot entirely by chimpanzees:

The acting isn’t that great, and the special effects are terrible, but it’s still more interesting than some of the rubbish churned out by Hollywood! The film was part of a scientific study investigating how chimps perceive the world around them.

Mars movies

Although it seems we’re probably not going to step foot Mars any time soon, you can go there virtually today. Doug Ellison, founder of UnmannedSpaceflight.com, has used data from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to recreate a faithfully recreated flyby of the Martian surface:

See more on his YouTube page.

Magnets…in space!

Have you ever wondered how magnets work in zero gravity? “Very well,” is the answer, according to video game developer/astronaut Richard Garriot:

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 17 January 2010 at 8:41 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Health & Medicine, Inventions & Technology, Weekly Roundup

In all the excitement of the new year, I forgot to explain my Just A Theory schedule for 2010. I’ve decided to post twice a week on Tuesdays and Thursdays, with the usual Weekly Roundup on a Sunday. Of course, there might be the occasional post outside that schedule, but its what I’m aiming for. Remember that you can always subscribe to the RSS feed and get notified each time a post goes up.

Fart FAQ

Everybody does it, even though sometimes we don’t want to admit it, so why not learn some facts about farts with this handy infographic?

Hold your nose and click for a larger image.
Hold your nose and click for a larger image.

Wii tech good enough for physio

A video game accessory designed to help you get fit could also be used to rehabilitate stroke victims, says a physiotherapist. Ross Clark of the University of Melbourne found the accuracy of a Wii balance board compared well to lab-grade “force platforms”, which normally cost more then £11,000.

Both pieces of equipment are designed to measure pressure from a person’s foot. The force platform aids physiotherapists in reteaching a stroke patient how to stand, and Clark found that a balance board could act as a suitable replacement, despite retailing for under £100.

Its not the first report of scientists using Wii controllers as cheap sensors in their work – see this Wired story, complete with a picture of a Wiimote in a lab stand.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 20 December 2009 at 5:45 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Health & Medicine, Weekly Roundup

I’ll be taking a break from Just A Theory from now until the start of next year. Now that I’m working full time I’m finding it a little harder to keep up with blogging, so I think it’ll be good to have some time off and recharge my batteries. Over Christmas I’ll be thinking about ways to improve the blog for 2010, so let me know if you have any suggestions. Enjoy the rest of 2009!

Drinking advice, straight from the source

With December 25th inching ever closer you’ve probably already been to a number of booze-fuelled Christmas parties, but have you thought about the long-term risks of drinking alcohol?

If you’re anything like me, probably not, but I did read this interview on the University of Oxford science blog with one of their scientists, Naomi Allen. She talks about the risks and benefits of drinking alcohol, and suggests middle-age women who are most at risk of breast cancer should probably hold back on the booze.

It’s good to hear the risks laid out in a clear and non-headline grabbing manner, but the interview is also an interesting example of institutional journalism. This piece could easily appear in a magazine or Sunday supplement, but Oxford have chosen to cut out the middle-man and publish themselves. We’re seeing more and more of this type of work crop up, as the media continues their struggle to reinvent themselves in a Web 2.0 world.

Micro-gallery

Who says bacteria can’t be beautiful? New Scientist have a gallery of Petri dish art created by microbiologists. My personal favourite, for obvious reasons, is this little guy:

It's-a-me!
It's-a-me!
Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Monday 14 December 2009 at 6:37 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Inventions & Technology

Another New Scientist article today:

Did four-legged dinosaurs gallop like a horse, run like an ostrich or hop like a kangaroo? All three have been suggested, but with only fossils to go on it’s a difficult puzzle to solve.

That’s why Bill Sellers, a computational zoologist at the University of Manchester, UK, has developed a new technique for simulating dinosaur movement and working out which gaits they most likely used.

Sellers and his team used a laser scanner to create a 3D computer model of the skeleton of an Edmontosaurus, a type of hadrosaur or “duck-billed” dinosaur, and added virtual muscles to make it move. Fossilisation does not preserve a dinosaur’s muscles, but educated guesses about how they worked can be made by studying animals alive today, such as ostriches.

You’ll find the rest at New Scientist, along with a video of the dinosaurs in action.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
1 Comment » Posted on Sunday 22 November 2009 at 3:52 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Getting It Right, Inventions & Technology, Physics, Psychology, Space & Astronomy, Weekly Roundup

A busy week has meant a pretty poor showing on Just A Theory, but hopefully a packed roundup will make up for it:

LHC a-go-go

The Large Hadron Collider is finally up and running again! As our CERN correspondent Emma mentioned last month, scientist in Geneva have been working on restarting the LHC after it had to be shut down last year. Their hard work paid off on Friday, and proton beams are now successfully colliding in the 27km-long ring of the world’s largest experiment. Now for the science!

What if the Earth had rings?

Speaking of rings, check out this short video showing how it would look if Earth had its own set, like Saturn.

At the equator they appear to be a thin line through the sky, but further north or south they make an amazing sight, lighting up the sky even at night. Anyway we can build these things and cover them in solar panels or something?

Field less players to win the World Cup

It seems that having a large squad to choose from can actually be a hindrance when it comes to top football. You might think fielding substitutions lets mangers pick the best players for every situation, but research shows that sticking with the top 11 is the key to success.

Bacteria that can detect landmines

Scientist at the University of Edinburgh have developed a strain of bacteria that glow green near explosives. By mixing them with a colourless solution, they can be sprayed from the air on to suspected landmine fields, turning the ground green if mines are detected.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Monday 9 November 2009 at 8:50 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Psychology

Cut grass, warm cakes, and dog poo. A strange combination maybe, but smelling any of the three is likely to evoke a certain memory for you. Everyone has experienced a sudden recollection after sniffing a particularly distinctive odour, and now a team of Israeli scientist have worked out why.

Graduate student Yaara Yeshurun of the Weizmann Institute of Science suspected that this memory association is formed when we first encounter a smell in a particular context. That’s why cut grass might take you back to summer’s day in your youth, but not to a walk in the park last Tuesday.

To test her hypothesis, Yeshurun and her team got 16 volunteers to look at 60 objects, each accompanied wither either a pleasant or unpleasant smell. Next, an fMRI scanner measured their brain activity as they looked over the images again and tried to recall the associated odour. Participants then repeated the test with different smells, before coming back a week later for another round of tests.

Yeshurun found that after one week, the participants showed a distinctive brain pattern when recalling the first odour – even if they remembered both equally. The scan revealed activity in the hippocampus and amygdala, the parts of the brain involved with memory and emotion, and allowed Yeshurun and colleagues to predict participants reactions based on the data from the first day of the experiment.

Investigating further, they repeated the entire experiment with sound instead of smell. Surprisingly, they found that the first-time association was not repeated. Commenting on her result, Yeshurun said:

“As far as we know, this phenomenon is unique to smell. Childhood olfactory memories may be special not because childhood is special, but simply because those years may be the first time we associate something with an odour.”

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
1 Comment » Posted on Monday 2 November 2009 at 7:59 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology

A meteorite impact may have wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, but we know a lot about them thanks to the fossils they left behind. Now it seems we might be due another extinction event, after a pair of paleontologists discovered a mistaken duplication of dinosaur species – including one named after Hogwarts, the wizard school in Harry Potter.

It turns out that scientists have been assigning different names to juvenile and adult fossils from the same species of dome-headed dinosaur, Pachycephalosaurus wyomingensis. The confusion arose because the younger ones start out with a set of horns that gradually morph into a dome as they get older.

“Juveniles and adults of these dinosaurs look very, very different from adults, and literally may resemble a different species,” said dinosaur expert Mark B. Goodwin, assistant director of the University of California, Berkeley’s Museum of Paleontology.

Working with John Horner of the Museum of the Rockies at Montana State University in Bozeman, Goodwin discovered that two species, Dracorex hogwartsia and Stygimoloch spinifer, have been misidentified. They published their research last week in the journal PLoS One.

D. hogwartsia (upper left) and S. spinifer (upper right) are actually younger versions of P. wyomingensis.
D. hogwartsia (upper left) and S. spinifer (upper right) are actually younger versions of P. wyomingensis.

What’s more, Horner suggest these two might not be the only dino duplicates. “What we are seeing in the Hell Creek Formation in Montana suggests that we may be overextended by a third,” he said. His colleague Goodwin blames fellow scientists for skimping on the details.

“Early paleontologists recognized the distinction between adults and juveniles, but people have lost track of looking at ontogeny – how the individual develops – when they discover a new fossil,” he said.

I’m sure many will be said to see the Harry Potter-inspired species go, but it’s not the first time we’ve lost a great name to the rules of science. In cases like this scientists revert to the name of the first fossil discovered, which is why Brontosaurus (thunder lizard) became Apatosaurus (deceptive lizard). The former is a much cooler name, but the latter wins out because it was discovered first. A shame, but them’s the rules!

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 1 November 2009 at 6:12 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Chemistry, Getting It Wrong, Mathematics, Weekly Roundup

Formulas, multiplied

For some reason the Independent have decided to publish the mother of all “formula for” stories – ten examples of the best worse science reporting there is. They include ones I’ve written about before, like the formula for the perfect pancake,but also a bunch I’d not previously seen. The best has to be the equation for the perfect sandcastle, which is OW = 0.125 x S. In other words, one part water, eight parts sand.

Lunch time at the Periodic Table

This photo of a literal Periodic Table has been doing the internet rounds recently:

Turns out it’s a piece of art work at Wake Forest University in North Carolina. It was created by two student in 2003, Nazila Alimohammadi and Anna Clark. Nice work – I’m always up for a good pun!

From coffee to carbon

Also floating about this internet this week was this interactive illustration of the size and scale of various cells from the University of Utah. Starting from a coffee bean and a grain of rice, you can zoom past human cells, bacteria and viruses before ending up at a single carbon atom. Zooming out is just as fun!

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 30 October 2009 at 4:45 pm by Colin Stuart
In Biology

ResearchBlogging.org

Researchers in China have found that by practicing fellatio on their male counterparts female short-nosed fruit bats can prolong sex.

Whilst oral sex is a common part of the human mating ritual, and occasionally observed in Bonobo monkeys, this is thought to be one of the first times that fellatio has been observed outside of the primates.

Min Tan and his team recorded females lowering their heads to lick the base or shaft of the male’s penis whilst copulation was occurring. This happened on 14 out of 20 copulations with the licking measured to last 19.14±3.45 seconds or approximately 8.7% of the duration of sex.

“We found that whether a female licked her mate’s penis during copulation had a significant influence on the duration of copulation. The pairs spent more time copulating if the female licked her mate’s penis than on occasions when females did not show licking behaviour. This result suggests that the licking behaviour may play an important role in copulation by prolonging intromission.”

The study concluded that every second of licking added a further 6 seconds to the duration of sex and suggests several reasons why this behaviour might be advantageous, including that,

“Prolonged copulation might assist sperm transport from the vagina to the oviduct, or stimulate secretions of the pituitary gland in the female and hence increase the likelihood of fertilization”

For those wishing to see the act in question the researchers supply a handy video.

Tan, M., Jones, G., Zhu, G., Ye, J., Hong, T., Zhou, S., Zhang, S., & Zhang, L. (2009). Fellatio by Fruit Bats Prolongs Copulation Time PLoS ONE, 4 (10) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007595

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
1 Comment » Posted on Monday 26 October 2009 at 10:37 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology

ResearchBlogging.org

Like many young children, I went through a phase of being obsessed with dinosaurs. I think the appeal is the idea that these monstrous animals actually existed, but are also safely locked away in the past and can’t hurt you.

Now, a new discovery by George Poinar Jr of Oregon State University shows that the dinosaurs weren’t the only monsters from the Cretacous period. He’s found a well-preserved specimen of a fly with five eyes and a horn, and it’s certainly going to give me nightmares.

An artists impression of the "monster" fly.
An artists impression of the "monster" fly.

Details of the strange creature were recently published in the journal Cretaceous Research. It’s called Cascoplecia insolitis, roughly translated as “old and unusual”. It’s certainly an apt description, as it lived from 97 to 100 million years ago and is anything but “usual” looking.

The fly and its strange horn, preserved in amber for millions of years.
Preserved in amber for millions of years.

Two of the fly’s five eyes are large and compound, like a regular household fly. The other three are smaller like a spider’s and sit atop a strange, unicorn-like horn.

It’s thought that this evolutionary specialism would have helped it see approaching predators more easily. The eye-covered horn would also aid the fly on reaching the pollen and nectar of very tiny flowers, but would have been a hindrance when larger plants evolved. With its freakish advantage lost, C. insolitis went extinct, and as far as we know its unique horn has never been seen again.

“No other insect ever discovered has a horn like that, and there’s no animal at all with a horn that has eyes on top,” said Poinar.

“One of the reviewers of the study called it a monster, and I have to admit it had a face only another fly could have loved. I was thinking of making some masks based on it for Halloween.”

I don’t know about that. If this thing rang my door screaming “trick or treat”, I’d probably run a mile. Give me dinosaurs any day!

Poinar Jr., G. (2009). Cascoplecia insolitis (Diptera: Cascopleciidae), a new family, genus, and species of flower-visiting, unicorn fly (Bibionomorpha) in Early Cretaceous Burmese amber Cretaceous Research DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2009.09.007

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 25 October 2009 at 10:29 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Climate Change & Environment, Weekly Roundup

Painted horses teach anatomy to vets

Champion horse rider Gillian Higgins has come up with a novel way for veterinary students to learn the skeletal structure of a horse – paint it directly on to the skin. Pretty cool, if slightly creepy!

Watch the carbon clock ticking

Early this year I wrote about research showing that the Earth effectively has a carbon budget of one trillion tonnes. Emitting more than this will lead to a global temperature rise of 2°C, and we’ve already spent over half a trillion.

To illustrate our spending, Professor Myles Allen of Oxford University has created a ticking carbon clock, counting down to the release of the trillionth tonne. That’s currently set for some time in March 2045 but as our rate of emissions continues to rise, this date gets nearer by the second. It’s sobering to watch.

Fancy a drink?

This photo of an ant refreshing itself after a hard day’s work was taken by András Mészáros, and won him a prize in the 2009 Veolia Environnement wildlife photographer of the year. Take a look at some of the other winners, including a wolf caught mid-jump and a stag with a crown of bracken.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Thursday 22 October 2009 at 6:50 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Just A Review, Psychology

Last week saw the start of a new series of Horizon, the BBC’s long-running science documentary programme. I wasn’t particularly impressed with last year’s offering, but I decided to give the show another chance this time around.

I managed to miss the first episode thanks to a confusing BBC press release, but caught this week’s which featured the media’s go-to mathematician and not-so-recently appointed Oxford Professor for the Public Understanding of Science, Marcus du Sautoy. He submits himself to a variety of bizarre experiments in an attempt to answer a puzzling question: how do we know who we are?

Humans are one of just nine species that pass what is known as the mirror test for self-awareness. A dot is placed on the test subject’s face and they are placed in front of a mirror. If they notice the dot, by trying to look at or touch it, they’ve recognised the reflection as themselves. Otherwise, the subject views their reflection as an entirely separate individual.

Du Sautoy sees this test in action early on in the programme, and it’s quite striking. A young baby completely ignores the dot, while a slightly older child immediatly attempts to peel it off. Is this where conciousness begins? What does conciousness even mean?

The programme doesn’t have an answer – it’s still an open question in science, of course. It’s certainly interesting watching du Sautoy exploring the limits of his conciousness though. One experiment placed him under the effect of heavy anaesthetic while in an MRI scanner, his conciousness seeming to slowly slip away as he rambled in a drunken fashion. In another, du Sautoy wears a pair of video glasses that can appear to place his sense of self behind his body – or even inside another person.

I’ll admit I’m already fairly familiar with all of these experiments from my readings in the annals of popular science, but seeing them being performed really adds to the experience. A shame then that some of the programmes editing had quite the opposite effect.

Look. I understand that putting together a science programme is a difficult task – shot after shot of talking head doesn’t make for great TV. Did we really need to see du Sautoy walking around hooked up to a Steadicam as he ponders? It made him look like a cleaned up Sir Digby Chicken Caesar.

Camera gripes aside, this episode was certainly an improvement on the last time I sat down to watch Horizon. It’s worth a watch, and I’ll be making an effort to check out a bit more in the coming weeks.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Wednesday 21 October 2009 at 8:00 pm by Colin Stuart
In Biology, Health & Medicine

ResearchBlogging.org

It has long been known that sleep deprivation affects your ability to remember things long term. Yet until now the exact mechanism causing these misplaced memories has been unclear.

The problem had been that the relationship between sleep deprivation and the brain is multi-faceted; it was hard to see the wood from the cerebral trees. But in a paper published in this week’s Nature, an international team of scientists report findings that suggest the culprit has been revealed.

In their study the researchers took mice that had been deprived of sleep for five hours and examined the hippocampus, the section of the brain known to play a fundamental role in long term memory.

They found that the sleep-deprived rodents had a higher level of an enzyme called PDE4 than those left to sleep normally. In order to make sure that these increased levels of PDE4 were indeed behind the long-term memory loss they tested whether the mice could recall a fear stimulus.

In mice that were treated with a drug that inhibits PDE4 production they found the effect was nullified and the sleepy mice could remember just as well as those rodents that had been well rested. Whereas the mice left with increased levels of PDE4 struggled when tested.

This research might have implications for those suffering with serious sleep deprivation such as new parents. However, further research is necessary to experiment with Rolipram, the drug used in the study, and its effectiveness combating memory problems in humans suffering with sleep deprivation.

Vecsey, C., Baillie, G., Jaganath, D., Havekes, R., Daniels, A., Wimmer, M., Huang, T., Brown, K., Li, X., Descalzi, G., Kim, S., Chen, T., Shang, Y., Zhuo, M., Houslay, M., & Abel, T. (2009). Sleep deprivation impairs cAMP signalling in the hippocampus Nature, 461 (7267), 1122-1125 DOI: 10.1038/nature08488

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 18 October 2009 at 7:31 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Health & Medicine, Mathematics, Space & Astronomy, Weekly Roundup

Apologies for my lack of posting this week, I’m once again hepped up on Lemsip as I battle against a cold. My fellow bloggers have done a great job at picking up the slack, but I still have a collection of interesting links from the past week. Here we go:

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
1 Comment » Posted on Thursday 15 October 2009 at 4:38 pm by Colin Stuart
In Biology

Biologists have genetically altered fruit flies so that they no longer produce pheromones, leading to their fellow insects becoming less discerning in their intimate endeavours.

Published in this week’s Nature, Joel Levine and his team genetically destroyed the cells that create the fruit flies’ sex scent. This led to orgy-bound chaos in the lab with the flies no longer knowing who to mate with. Unaltered males tried getting it on with their scentless male counterparts, whilst some normal male flies become enamoured with altered female flies of a completely different species.

The team found that it was just a single molecule that creates the normal chemical barrier allowing individual insects to know who is fair game when it comes to mating, “..the same chemical signals and genes are underlying not only social behaviour in groups, like courtship and mating, but also behaviour between species,” said Levine.

Whilst acknowledging that the human courting ritual is more complicated than the fruit flies’ Levine went on to say:

“…we may rely more on the visual system, and we may have a more complex way of assessing other individuals and classifying them and determining how we’re going to relate to them than a fly does. But what we’re looking at is a spectrum across biology of a tendency to understand how others relate to ourselves. “

Despite these findings I still can’t help think that no matter what Jodie Marsh smelt like, I still just wouldn’t.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
1 Comment » Posted on Tuesday 13 October 2009 at 8:14 pm by Seth Bell
In Biology

It was a clear moonlit night. They had been passionate together before, but when their eyes meet across the crowded swamp their desires were reignited…

Ok, I’ll probably never make it as a Mills & Boon writer, but this scenario isn’t a million miles away from the reality of alligator mating habits. According to a ten year study published in the journal Molecular Ecology, up to 70% of alligators choose to remain with their previous partners for several years, even when females are free to move through crowded male swamps.

The study provides the first evidence for crocodilian male fidelity, a characteristic they share with birds, their evolutionary relatives. Cold blooded crocodilians may not have a reputation for being caring and thoughtful, but in fact they are amongst the few reptilians which nurture and protect their young.

The study, carried out at the swamps in the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries’ Rockefeller Wildlife refuge, surprised Stacey Lance, one of the researchers in the study:

“I don’t think any of us expected that the same pair of alligators that bred together in 1997 would still be breeding together in 2005 and may still be producing nests together this day.”

Because crocodilians like alligators are archosaurs, the study could provide insight into the ancient breeding of dinosaurs who are part of the same family; let’s hope it does because finding out more about dinosaurs is always fun (almost as fun as using the word crocodilian!)

Of course alligators probably can’t feel love, but this research suggests they are surprisingly faithful. If you’re anything like me you’ve seen the episode of Friends where Phoebe describes Rachel as “Ross’ lobster” too many times to count.  Maybe “she’s his alligator” would have been more fitting.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 9 October 2009 at 2:09 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Chemistry, Inventions & Technology, Physics

The past week has seen the announcement of this year’s Nobel Prizes. As with last year, I thought I’d wait for them to all come out before taking a look at the “science” ones:

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

This prize was split equally between Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol Greider and Jack Szostak for their work in the 1980s on telomeres, the “protective caps” on the ends of the chromosomes that contain our genetic information.

These caps allow chromosomes to be copied end-to-end during cell division by protecting them against degradation. Telomeres are also a key part of the ageing process; as the telomeres shorten, cells begin to age. Maintaining telomeres through use of the enzyme that forms them (telomerase) could lead to new medical treatments.

The Nobel Prize in Physics

One half of this prize was awarded to Charles Kao for research in 1966 that lead to the invention of fibre optic cables. Kao figured out how to transmit light signals over 100 kilometers, allowing high-speed transfer of data around the world. Without his work you wouldn’t be reading this, because the internet would be impossible.

The other half was shared by Willard Boyle and George Smith for the invention of the charged-couple device (CCD) in 1969. Found in everything from digital cameras to space probes, the CCD uses the photoelectric effect (for the theorising of which Albert Einstein received a Nobel Prize in 1921) to convert light in to electric signals. As well as ushering in the era of digital photography, CCDs are used extensively throughout the whole of scientific research.

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Finally, this prize was also split equally, between Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas Steitz, and Ada Yonath for their work on understanding the structure of the ribosome.

Ribosomes act as a kind of molecular interrupter, translating a DNA sequence in to the proteins that make up life. Using X-ray crystallography, the trio mapped the structure of the ribosome to generate 3D models of it in action. These are used to study the effects of antibiotics on bacterial ribosomes, and thus create new treatments for disease.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Thursday 1 October 2009 at 5:42 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

The last few weeks have seen some interesting developments regarding animal research, catch up on the lastest news with Understanding Animal Research:

Lack of sleep linked to Alzheimer’s

Studies using mice suggest that lack of sleep could increase the development of toxic plaques in the brain, accelerating the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

To read more on this story, please follow the link.

White blood cells found to set the pace of wound repair

After more than fifty experiments in mice, scientists have mapped out how a set of white blood cells (lymphocytes) set the pace of recovery after serious lung injury.

To read more on this story, please follow the link.

Gene therapy for colour blindness

A team of scientists have restored colour vision to two colour blind squirrel monkeys using gene therapy.

To read more on this story, please follow the link.

Also….

Last week two prominent scientists in America published an article about the need for change in the communication of issues surrounding animal research.

The article, We Must Face The Threats, tackles the difficult topic of animal rights extremists, and the effect they are having on the scientific community.

Animal research is always a difficult topic to discuss. Trying to present a balanced argument can be as difficult as trying to avoid a mine in a field of landmines. However, I believe that in this case, the authors of the paper, Dario Ringach and David Jentsch have managed to keep to the facts, rather than reverting to ‘mud slinging’ and ‘calling names’.

Ringach and Jentsch also describe how the public are often influenced by groups other than scientists when it comes to the topic of science. This is a problem for science across the whole of the field, not exclusively animal research

The article describes how the entertainment industry contributes to the “misperception of science, producing movies that increasingly portray humans and technology as the source of evil”. Only last night I was watching Spaced – the episode where a dog was snatched by an ‘insane’ scientist who was conducting animal research in an illegal lab – hardly how animal testing happens in this country…!

Ringach and Jentsch also voice their frustrations (which I share), at celebrities wearing AIDS or cancer ribbons one day, and then supporting PETA’s (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) fundraising events, or featuring in their advertising campaigns the next. Many of you will have heard about the recent scandal with Naomi Campbell, who posed naked in the 90s as part of PETAs I’d Rather go Naked than Wear Fur campaign, but recently became the face of an advertising campaign for a luxury New York furrier, Dennis Basso. Cases like this make me wonder the reasons why celebrities support PETA – are they fully informed of all of their policies?

However, Ringach and Jentsch do well to steer clear of these questions (better than me anyway), and do not waste their time repeating what others have done before them – pointing out the countless problems with the animal-rights views. Instead, their overall message is that these issues only cause a problem because the message is being presented with little opposing force from the scientific community.

They are therefore calling for the “scientific community to make a concerted effort in condemning animal-rights extremism and in reaching out to the public to explain our work, its importance, and out commitment to the strictest ethical guidelines of animal research”.

They also emphasize the need to “acknowledge an increasing divide on how animal experimentation is perceived by the broad public.” They believe that “we should open a discourse on the topic, explaining the key role animal research plays in our work and what our society stands to lose if we were to stop it.”

To all those scientists who are sceptical of openness about their role in animal research, it should be pointed out that Ringach and Jentsch, along with their families, have suffered at the hands of extremists, therefore their conclusions come from first hand experience.

They are also out there, putting these ideas into practice. Ringach and Jentsch are members of a US organisiaion called Speaking of Research. Speaking of Research can be compared to the UK’s Pro-test, indeed Tom Holder spokesperson for Pro-test, has been in the US for the past few years getting this fledgling organization onto it’s feet. Drawing on the success in the UK, where animal rights extremism has decreased over recent years, the group aims to support and campaign on behalf of scientists against the extremists.

I believe that this paper not only makes solid points in regards to animal research, but also to the scientific community at large. Yes there are some who are already trying to stem the tide of pseudo-scinece (Ben Goldacre’s column and Sense about Science are just two examples), but they are just a drop in the ocean, and it is the scientists who must take action together, whatever their field of research. As Ringach and Jentsch conclude:

“We must prove that ’scientific community’ means something more than the mere fact that we publish in the same journals and attend the same conferences. We must stand together to defend those colleagues under attack and defend the research we believe to be ethical and critical for our understanding of the brain in health and disease. The public is ready to listen.”

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 27 September 2009 at 4:47 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Space & Astronomy, Weekly Roundup

Scientists find water EVERYWHERE

Well, not quite, but close. In a strange coincidence, the discovery of water on the surface of both the Moon and Mars was announced this week. Future astronauts could use the water to establish a lunar or Martian bases.

The findings were made by the Indian Chandrayaan-1 probe, a fantastic result for the nation’s first lunar mission. The probe detected that light reflected from the Moon’s surface was missing wavelengths known to be absorbed by water. This was later backed up by the NASA Deep Impact and Cassini probes.

NASA also made the discovery on Mars, where the agency’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter snapped pictures of melting water-ice that had been thrown up from under the surface by a recent meteorite impact.

Science rap returns

It’s nearly exactly a year since rapper Jonathan Chasa entertained us with his astrobiology rap, but now he’s back again as
Oort Kuiper to tell us about genes:

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 20 September 2009 at 11:21 am by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Space & Astronomy, Weekly Roundup

Amazing astronomy

Check out this set of astronomy images from flickr user victorvonsalza. This one below is my favourite – be sure to click through for the larger version!

The images were taken in Portland, Oregon, and show a variety of dramatic starscapes.

See-through frog

This little guy comes from an amphibian family known as glass frogs, for reasons that should be fairly obvious. It’s both fascinating and slightly horrifying that you can see their innards from the outside…

Wet Mars, Dry Mars

Giant cracks across the surface of Mars hint that the dusty planet had a much wetter past. Although the cracks have been observed before, it’s only now that their true origin has been revealed.

Ramy El Maarry, a PhD student at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, created a computer model of the cracking process, which forms irregular shapes in the ground up to 250 metres in diameter. The marks have previously been attributed to the heating and cooling of the planet’s surface, but El Maarry’s model showed that this would only produces shapes as large as 65 metres.

He realised that the shapes resembled the “desiccation cracks” found on Earth when water evaporates to leave dry and dusty mud. Comparing the two side by side makes it a pretty convincing hypothesis:

Cracks on Earth (left) compared with Mars (right).
Cracks on Earth (left) compared with Mars (right).
Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 18 September 2009 at 10:59 am by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Yes folks, it’s that time of week again….here’s the latest from Understanding Animal Research:

How Broccoli protects arteries

C2AFE2FF-BE37-14AC-DF9E04E0F65B3A95Researchers have discovered one reason why broccoli and other green leafy vegetables are definitely good for you. Using mice, they discovered that a chemical found in these green vegetables – sulforaphane – could protect arteries from clogging, so reducing the chance of heart attacks.

Previous research has shown that certain areas of the arteries are more prone to the build up of fatty plaques. The mouse study showed that, in these areas, a protein called Nrf2 is inactive.

To read more on this story, please follow the link.

Stem cell link to prostate cancer

A new study identifies a stem cell that may cause some types of prostate cancer, at least in mice. Called CARNs (castrion-resistant Nkx2.1-expressing cells), they are responsible for creating luminal cells, which secrete chemicals into the prostate.

When they inactivated certain tumour suppressor genes in the CARN cells of mice, the team saw out-of-control growth of the luminal cells, which can lead to the formation of a tumour. The study also found that, surprisingly, the cells did not rely on male sex hormones such as androgens to thrive.

To read more on this story, please follow the link.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Sunday 13 September 2009 at 6:14 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Climate Change & Environment, Weekly Roundup

Human nails are growing faster

Your finger and toenails are growing faster than they would have 70 years ago, according to the Daily Mail. It sounds like nonsense, but it’s apparantly true.

Research published in in the Journal Of The European Academy Of Dermatology And Venereology last week found that the average thumbnail grows at 3.55mm a month, compared to the 3mm a month reported by a study in 1938.

Our modern-day diet could be the cause, say researchers from the University of North Carolina. Unfortunately I haven’t been able to access the paper to read their full results, but another explanation does occur to me: perhaps the 1938 study was simply inaccurate, and nails continue to grow at the same rate they always have.

Green energy

Trees contain enough power to run a small electric circuit, scientists at the University of Washington have found. Although the energy output is very small, it could be put to use powering sensors to monitor environmental conditions or forest fires.

Using nanotechnology components which do not require much power, the team created a circuit that uses an average of 10 nanowatts. By comparison, a 100W lightbulb uses 10 billion times as much power. The results will soon be published in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’ Transactions on Nanotechnology.

Despite their success, the researchers don’t yet understand where the tree power comes from, according to one of the paper’s co-authors, Babak Parviz:

“It’s not exactly established where these voltages come from. But there seems to be some signaling in trees, similar to what happens in the human body but with slower speed,

“I’m interested in applying our results as a way of investigating what the tree is doing. When you go to the doctor, the first thing that they measure is your pulse. We don’t really have something similar for trees.”

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
1 Comment » Posted on Wednesday 9 September 2009 at 3:21 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Health & Medicine

ResearchBlogging.org

What happens to fat left over from a liposuction procedure? Brad Pitt might choose to turn it in to soap, but scientists at Stanford University have figured out a surprising alternative: stem cells. Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are highly sought after because of their ability to transform in to many other types of cells within the human body. Finding a reliable source for these stem cells has provided difficult but Michael Longaker, one of the paper’s authors, believes fat could be the perfect solution.

Longaker calls liposuction leftovers “liquid gold“, because certain cells within the fat can be readily converted to usable stem cells. What’s more, it can be done much quicker and easier than current methods. Most stem cells are derived from skin tissue, but this can take at least 4 weeks until the stem cells are ready for use. There is also a risk of cross-species contamination, because “feeder cells” taken from mice must often be used to help the human cells grow.

The new method, detailed online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, can start producing stem cells on the same day as the fat is extraced. What’s more, it doesn’t require the use of feeder cells to get going.

Liposuction is most often used as a form of cosmetic surgery, but this development could see us all undergoing a minor form of the treatment. Removing small amounts of fat from a patient’s own body would allow for the creation of stem cells used in their treatment. For example, a person with heart disease could have fat extracted and turned into heart cells, allowing doctors to test out drugs without putting the patient at risk.

Sun, N., Panetta, N., Gupta, D., Wilson, K., Lee, A., Jia, F., Hu, S., Cherry, A., Robbins, R., Longaker, M., & Wu, J. (2009). Feeder-free derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult human adipose stem cells Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908450106

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Monday 7 September 2009 at 5:33 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

The dissertation-ing indeed continues, bring on Friday is all I can say… but in the meantime i’m still writing for UAR. Highlights this week:

Leishmania parasites feed immune cells

W0041701 Phlebotomine sand flyResearchers using mice have shown how the leishmaniasis parasite, transmitted by sand flies, establishes infection. Leishmaniasis is a disfiguring and potentially fatal parasitic infection that affect some 350 million people worldwide.

Contrary to previous research, they found that it is not the sand flies’ saliva that helps the parasite establish an infection, but a secreted gel called PSG. It is produced by the Leishmania parasite, and forms a plug which blocks the gut. This forces the sand fly to regurgitate to dislodge the plug and feed properly, which simultaneously deposits the parasite and some of the gel into the human body.

To read further, please click here.

Diesel fumes grow new blood vessels?

New findings indicate that the link between diesel exhaust fumes and cancer lies in the ability of particles within the exhaust fumes to cause the growth of new blood vessels, which can aid tumour development.

The team reported a six-fold increase in the formation of new blood vessels in the implanted tissues and aortas of mice exposed to the diesel fumes. In the mice with reduced blood supply, they saw a four-fold increase in new vessels to the hind limbs. The formation of new blood vessels is strongly associated with tumor growth; tumours grow rapidly, consuming large quantities of oxygen and nutrients.

To read further, please click here.

Key protein in obesity related diseases

It is well known that obesity can lead to health problems such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and it is thought that this is due to low-grade inflammation.

Scientists believe they may have found the protein which causes this inflammation using mice. The protein, called angiopoietin-like protein 2 (Angptl2), is a fat-derived protein. The team showed that the levels of Angptl2 are raised in the fatty tissue of GM mice, especially in tissue with a low oxygen supply.

To read further, please click here.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 28 August 2009 at 3:48 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Another week and another bunch of research headlines from Understanding Animal Research:

How do you mend a broken heart?

A team of scientists have developed a patch which could help the heart to heal after damage. Heart attacks often cause irreversible damage to the heart muscle, leaving survivors more prone to further attacks or heart failure.

In a recent study, scientists took immature heart cells from newborn rats, and placed them onto a biodegradable ’scaffold’. They then exposed the patch to chemicals which encouraged the cells to grow, before transplanting it into the abdomens of rats.

To read more about this story please click here.

Monkeys with two mums may eradicate mitochondrial disorders

Scientists have produced four infant monkeys using a technique which could stop women with genetic diseases passing them on to their children. Faulty DNA contained within cell structures called mitochondria was replaced by healthy mitcochondrial DNA (mDNA) from a donor egg, so genetic faults were not passed from mother to baby.

To read more about this story please click here.

Low-carb diets could be more damaging than you’d think

A team studying the effect of diet on the cardiovascular system in mice have shown that a diet low in carbohydrates could lead to artery damage.

Three groups of mice each received a different diet: a standard mouse type, a western diet (high in fat) and a low-carb, high-protein version. After 12 weeks, one sixth more of the mice eating the low-carb diet had developed atherosclerosis compared with the standard diet.

To read more about this story please click here.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Saturday 22 August 2009 at 7:05 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

This week’s updates from UAR headquarters:

New target for stopping colon cancer

A team of scientists studying mice have found a target that could lead to an effective way to kill colon cancer cells.

Past treatments for many types of cancer target the epidermal growth factor (EGFR). This belongs to a group of proteins that signal cells to reproduce; if the cells can no-longer reproduce, then the cancer cannot spread.

However, the drugs designed to target the receptor have shown very little effect against colon cancer,so the search is on for new targets. The new study identified the ERBB3 receptor (a close relation to EGFR) as a candidate.

To read the rest of this story please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

‘Magnetic’ stem cells target damaged blood vessels

Scientists have harnessed the power of magnetism to guide stem cells towards damaged tissue in rats. The team coated stem cells with iron nanoparticles.

This allowed them to be moved by an external magnet around the body, to the site of injury. It also allowed their path to be tracked using MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scanners.

They used endothelial progenitor stem cells, which circulate in the blood and are involved in the healing of blood vessels. They become endothelial cells, the cells that line the blood vessels.

To read the rest of this story please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Wednesday 19 August 2009 at 8:30 am by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Psychology

We’re normally warned about the dangers of exercising too little, but it seems that too much physical activity can also be a problem. A drug which causes withdrawal symptoms in heroin addicts can have the same effect in rats after excessive use of exercise wheels. Rats which exercised the most had the severest symptoms.

A study published in the journal Behavioral Neuroscience split rats in to an active and inactive group, and gave each group either one hour of food a day, or a round-the-clock feast. To examine their addiction to exercise, all rats were given naloxone, a medicine for heroin overdose that produces immediate withdrawal symptoms.

The active rats who ate for only one hour a day were the heaviest exercisers, and also the worst hit by withdrawal symptoms. Their behaviour mimicked a potentially fatal eating disorder called anorexia athletica, in which exercise undertaken to lose weight becomes as addictive as taking drugs. Inactive rats had little reaction to the drug, regardless of how much they ate.

It seems that exercising activates the same part of the brain as drugs. Working out releases endorphins and dopamine, giving a sense of reward. This research should not be used as an excuse for avoiding exercise though, warns lead author Robin Kanarek:

“As with food intake and other parts of life, moderation seems to be the key. Exercise, as long as it doesn’t interfere with other aspects of one’s life, is a good thing with respect to both physical and mental health.”

Instead, the researchers hope their work may lead to new treatments for addiction that incorporate moderate forms of exercise. Addicts could be weaned off drugs by replacing their missing sense of reward with exercise.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Monday 17 August 2009 at 3:29 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

This weeks updates from UAR headquarters:

Buzz surrounds cancer treatment

A group of scientists has harnessed the power of bee venom and used it to kill tumour cells in mice. By arming small particles dubbed nanobees with the bee venom melittin, they successfully delivered the toxin directly to tumours.

To read the rest of this story please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

How infection can lead to psychiatric problems

Scientists using mice have discovered how early exposure to a common type of bacterium can lead to psychiatric disorders. PANDAS (Paediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infection not the furry black and white kind!) causes problems such as obsessive-compulsive behaviour, ticks and Tourette syndrome.

In this study researchers showed how a specific strain of streptococcus bacteria – GABHS – can cause PANDAS symptoms in mice.

To read the rest of this story please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Delaying motor neuron disease

By blocking the production of a faulty protein in mice, researchers have delayed the onset of motor neurone disease, improved mobility, and extended life-span. Motor neurone diseases affect the cells that control movement.

To read the rest of this story please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 14 August 2009 at 1:40 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology

ResearchBlogging.org

Picture a dog playing with a ball. The dog is alive, and the ball is inanimate. Obvious stuff, but how do we know? You might think our brains use visual cues to sort the living from the non-living, but research published in the journal Neuron this week proves it’s a little more complicated.

A team of scientists lead by Alfonso Caramazza of Harvard University found that even people who have been blind since birth use different areas of the brain when thinking about dogs or balls.

The part of the brain used to identify objects is known as the ventral stream. Previous research has shown that looking at inanimate objects like a spanner or a house activates a different part of the ventral stream to viewing animals or faces.

In an experiment with both sighted and blind individuals, participants were asked to listen to recordings of various words, including animals and tools. They then had to judge which category the word belonged to (living or non-living) and the relative sizes of the objects described.

“Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that the same regions of the ventral stream that show category preferences for non-living stimuli and animals in sighted adults, show the same category preferences in adults who are blind since birth,” explains Caramazza.

The researcher caution this does not necessarily mean sighted individuals don’t use visual information to categories objects. It does however suggest that blind individuals access the same areas of the brain by using a different stimuli such as hearing or touch.

Mahon, B., Anzellotti, S., Schwarzbach, J., Zampini, M., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Category-Specific Organization in the Human Brain Does Not Require Visual Experience Neuron, 63 (3), 397-405 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.012

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 7 August 2009 at 4:13 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Glaucoma reversed in rats and humans

Researchers have reversed the symptoms of glaucoma in rats using medicated eye drops. Further tests on a small number of human patients also showed promising results. Glaucoma is caused by increased intraocular pressure (pressure inside the eye). This gradually causes damage to the optic nerve, which eventually leads to blindness. Researchers used rats suffering from glaucoma to test eye drops containing nerve growth factor (NGF).

To read the rest of this story please visit the Understanding Animal Research website.

Rodent teeth grown from stem cells

mice toothMice have grown new teeth from stem cells implanted into the jawbone. Stem cell technology has been used before to produce tissues, but in a limited way. This is the first time a study has shown that a few cells can go on to produce a fully functioning organ. The team began by removing the upper molars from five-week-old mice. They developed a seed-like bioengineered tooth tissue containing stem cells and the genetic instructions necessary to form a tooth, and transplanted the tissue into the jawbones of mice. The implanted cells developed into fully formed teeth with an identical structure to normal teeth.

To read the rest of this story please visit the Understanding Animal Research website.

Heart stimulated to heal itself

Scientists have shown for the first time that it is possible to stimulate the heart to heal itself without the use of stem cell technology. Heart muscle cells are undifferentiated in a fetus, so are able to multiply and grow to create new heart muscle tissue. However, as the fetus develops, these cells become differentiated and, it was previously thought, no longer produce new tissue. This has consequences in adults when damage occurs to the muscle, for example in heart attacks and in congenital heart defects.

To read the rest of this story please visit the Understanding Animal Research website.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 24 July 2009 at 7:11 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Inventions & Technology, Mathematics, Yes, But When?

I guess it’s fitting that I should write a story about bacteria whilst feeling ill:

Computers are evolving – literally. While the tech world argues netbooks vs notebooks, synthetic biologists are leaving traditional computers behind altogether. A team of US scientists have engineered bacteria that can solve complex mathematical problems faster than anything made from silicon.

The research, published today in the Journal of Biological Engineering, proves that bacteria can be used to solve a puzzle known as the Hamiltonian Path Problem. Imagine you want to tour the 10 biggest cities in the UK, starting in London (number 1) and finishing in Bristol (number 10). The solution to the Hamiltonian Path Problem is the the shortest possible route you can take.

Read the rest at the Guardian

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 24 July 2009 at 4:29 pm by Sam Wong
In Biology

A statement by the campaign group Equal Rights for Skin Cells

Scientists have for the first time successfully cloned a mouse from skin cells reprogrammed to an embryo-like state. In a paper published online in Nature this week, Chinese scientists described a procedure in which adult mouse skin cells were genetically manipulated to turn them into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. These iPS cells were then injected into a tetraploid embryo – created by fusing two embryonic mouse cells but only capable of forming placental tissue. In this environment, the iPS cells developed into a fully-fledged embryo, which was implanted into a surrogate mother. Twenty days later, the mother gave birth to a mouse that was genetically identical to the mouse from which the skin cells were taken.

This study has shown for the first time that stem cells derived from skin cells can be used to create a living creature. It surely follows that skin cells are equal in status to embryos – both can give rise to life. Just as an embryo is a human being who has not yet been born, a skin cell is a human being who has not yet been reprogrammed, injected into a tetraploid embryo, implanted into a surrogate mother and born.

Equal Rights for Skin Cells (ERSC) has been set up by those of us who believe that skin cells deserve to be recognised as human beings, just like embryos. We affirm that the government must protect the basic rights of skin cells, for each one of them could be made into a person if only a scientist took the trouble. Billions of skin cells are lost from every person every day. This means that quadrillions of potential human beings are dying every day, and the government doesn’t seem to care. Join us in our fight to put an end to this senseless loss of life.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 24 July 2009 at 2:50 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Researchers have used mice to pinpoint what goes wrong in aneuploidy. Aneuploidy describes genetic disorders affecting chromosomes, usually resulting in an extra chromosome. Such disorders include Down syndrome and Edwards syndrome, and often cause pregnancy loss.

The researchers were looking at mutations of a particular gene in mice, to determine its role in colon cancer development. However, during the study they noticed that the mice carrying one copy of a mutation in the Bub1 gene had fewer offspring.

Further studies found that this effect was confined to female mice. If a mother’s egg had a mutation in one of the copies of Bub1 then she was more likely to have fewer offspring that survived until birth. They also found that the mutation was more harmful the older the mice were, which is the same for aneuploidy in humans.

Bub-1 works as a checkpoint in cell division, controlling the spindles which pull the chromosomes apart during cell division. It is likely that the mutation disrupts this process, resulting in extra chromosomes in the egg cells. Further tests will study the mutation in more detail to see if this is the case, and whether the mutation is present in humans.

For more information on animal testing, and this story, see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 24 July 2009 at 2:45 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Using mice, scientists have pinpointed the molecule which is responsible for making allergic reactions more severe.

The team studied patients who had experienced anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction) during surgery. They found that these patients had very high levels of the hormone IL-33. Further studies using mice showed that this hormone significantly increases inflammation.

Inflammation is triggered during anaphylactic shock. This reaction is often so severe that constricts the airway, leading to breathing difficulties and even death. By blocking the IL-33 hormone in mice the researchers were able to reduce the inflammation to non threatening levels.

The next stage is to study the hormone in more detail to better understand why it causes such severe inflammation. In the future, IL-33 inhibitors could change the way we treat anaphylaxis and could save many lives.

For more information on animal testing, and this story, see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
2 Comments » Posted on Thursday 23 July 2009 at 5:13 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology

Just a quick post today, as I’ve been struck down with some sort of illness. Thankfully it isn’t swine flu, as my temperature remain normal, but it’s still pretty unpleasant. Nevermind that though, you’ve got a cool science video to be watching:

Watching this video is the first time I’ve ever heard of a helicase, which is the amazing little biological machine that splits up a strand of DNA and copies it. As you can see, it actually works like a tiny motor, pulling the DNA apart and sticking it back together. Amazing.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
4 Comments » Posted on Sunday 19 July 2009 at 9:47 am by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Health & Medicine, Inventions & Technology, Mathematics, Weekly Roundup

Travelating in slow motion

The moving walkways used in airports actually slow you down, according to scientists in America. Research has found that people reduce their speed when stepping on to a travelator, making the human conveyor belts only marginally faster than walking. This is only true on an empty walkway however, as any congestion will drop your speed to less than a normal walking pace.

Manoj Srinivasan of Princeton University created a mathematical model to investigate the problem. Publishing in the journal Chaos, he found that the conflict between what your eyes see and your legs feel is responsible for the reduction in speed.

Visual cues tell the brain you are travelling faster than your legs are walking, so in order to conserve energy you slow down. This means that using an empty travelator will only save you about 11 seconds for every 100-metre stretch, compared to walking on regular ground.

But as any regular fliers know, airport travelators are rarely empty. Another study by Seth Young of Ohio State University found that delays due to other travellers getting in the way occur so often that you are better off avoiding the walkway all together. “Moving walkways are the only form of transportation that actually slow people down,” said Young, speaking to New Scientist.

Wii-ly good for you

Active video games like Wii Sports can be a good alternative to moderate exercise for children, according to a study published in the journal Pediatrics.

While not a replacement for more intensive sporting activities, scientists at the University of Oklahoma found they were comparably to a moderate walk. Children aged 10-13 were monitored as they watched television, played the Wii and walked on a treadmill. Both gaming and walking increased the number of calories burned by two to three times. As such, the researchers suggest encouraging kids to play active games instead of more passive ones.

Facebook for scientists

UK researchers have created myExperiment, a social networking site for scientists. Intended to challenge traditional models of academic publishing, it allows scientists to share “Research Objects”.

Rather than just publishing a paper, myExperiment lets users share data, files, and other information required to understand and reuse research. The site also allows the usual social networking interactions, such as messaging and groups.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Saturday 18 July 2009 at 10:23 pm by Sam Wong
In Biology, Health & Medicine

How can you tell that a cell is a stem cell? It’s really quite difficult. You can only really know by seeing whether they can regenerate tissue after being implanted into another animal. Either that or by showing that a single cell in culture can generate a line of genetically identical cells that then develop into a range of mature cell types.

In practice, scientists tend to infer that a cell is a stem cell if it tests positive for particular protein markers that are thought to be indicative of a specific type of cell. But according to new research, some of these tests are not very reliable.

Endothelial progenitor cells, or EPCs for short, are a type of stem cell that gives rise to the endothelial cells that line the walls of our blood vessels. They originate in the bone marrow and circulate in the bloodstream. Many scientists hope that EPCs can be used in new therapies to repair heart tissue, and they have already been used in clinical trials, but with limited success. A paper published in the journal Blood this week suggested that this could be because the EPCs they used were not EPCs at all.

Marianna Prokopi and colleagues at the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence at King’s College London discovered that the normal methods used to isolate EPCs in fact produce samples that are contaminated with platelets, a constituent of the blood. This is a problem because the protein markers used to identify EPCs are abundant in platelets. Platelets themselves are pretty difficult to confuse with other types of cell since they’re small and don’t have a nucleus. But it seems that proteins can be transferred from platelets into other cells.

Platelets readily disintegrate into “microparticles”, which get swallowed up by the bone marrow mononuclear cells that researchers are hoping to grow into EPCs. Thus the mononuclear cells acquire proteins from the platelets that make them look like EPCs.

Team leader Dr Manuel Mayr said: “Our results suggest that cells used in some clinical trials may have been masquerading as EPCs, but were actually a different type of cell. We need to develop new ways of purifying EPCs and new markers to identify them that are unique to these cells. This will help us understand the properties of the cells themselves and whether EPCs are actually able to contribute to the repair of heart tissue before they are tested in trials on people. Otherwise, we cannot be certain whether potential benefits or side effects are due to stem cells or contaminating platelets.”

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Friday 17 July 2009 at 3:08 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Scientists have produced an artificial hormone that causes rapid weight loss in mice. Previous studies have suggested that single treatments for obesity cannot reduce weight by more than 5-10%. While surgery remains the closest thing we have to a cure, this is very invasive. So many studies are looking at ways of using hormones to reduce weight.

Researchers combined the sequences of two hormones (glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1) to produce a synthetic molecule that activates multiple receptors. The two hormones are similar in structure, but have different functions. Their potential is the subject of current obesity research after scientists showed they can increase the use of calories by the body.

After just a week on the new hormone, the mice lost a quarter of their weight and their fat mass reduced by over a third. Follow-up tests after a month showed even greater loss – reductions of nearly a third and over two thirds respectively.

The technique of activating multiple receptors in a single treatment could prove to be a more potent treatment, opening up a whole new way of thinking about the way we treat of obesity.

For more information on animal research and this story, please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 7:13 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Over the next few weeks I will be doing some work at the Guardian, mostly on their science blog. Whilst I hope to still have some original Just A Theory content, I’ll also be linking to my posts over there. Here is the first, on yet another study into calorie restriction as a means of holding back the years:

The idea that severely reducing your calorie intake will help you live longer may not be as straightforward as reports last week suggested. Eating a radically restricted diet may weaken the immune system and actually shorten life.

While eating less has been shown to slow the ageing process in a variety of animals, these tests are normally conducted in artificial conditions with little or no exposure to potentially life-shortening diseases. Hence the apparent contradiction.

Research into slowing the ageing process through dieting began as early as 1934 when researchers at Cornell University discovered that rats given a restricted diet could live nearly twice as long as normal. Calorie restriction as a route to longer life has now been confirmed in fruit flies, roundworms, and most recently monkeys, but all of these studies kept the animals in unnaturally clean surroundings.

Read the rest at the Guardian.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
2 Comments » Posted on Monday 13 July 2009 at 9:23 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Psychology

ResearchBlogging.org

You grip the nail tightly in one hand, a hammer ready to swing in the other. Lift it up – and bam! You’ve just hit own thumb and are now turning the air blue. Swearing is a common reaction to pain, and a new study published in the journal NeuroReport suggests it can actually help reduce the effect.

Richard Stephens, John Atkins and Andrew Kingston of Keele University investigated the science of swearing by asking 67 volunteers to submerge their hand in a bowl of ice-cold water for a maximum of five minutes. The volunteers had to repeat the swear word of their choice until they couldn’t stand the pain. As a control, they were also asked to do the same procedure whilst repeating a word used “to describe a table”.

One person had to be removed from the study because they couldn’t think of a swear word, but the rest managed just fine. The results showed that on average, men could suffer the pain for around 45 seconds longer when swearing, whilst women managed an additional 37 seconds.

Both sexes also demonstrated a reduction on the Perceived Pain Scale, which measures how much people feel pain. This is in contrast to the scientists’ initial hypothesis that swearing would actually increase feelings of pain.

It isn’t clear why swearing has this effect, though in the paper the researchers suggest swearing could induce a fight-or-flight response and nullifies the link between fear of pain and the perception of pain. All participants registered an increase in heart rate whilst swearing, which supports this theory.

As an aside, the research has unsurprisingly been picked up by various media outlets including the BBC and Daily Mail. Both reports make reference to Rohan Byrt of the Casual Swearing Appreciation Society. Intrigued as to the nature of such an austere society, I was puzzled when a Google search showed no obvious results.

It seems that the “society” is actually nothing more then a Facebook group, and Mr Byrt is the self-appointed “Sir Saysfuckalot”. If this shoddy journalism pains you, I suggest you make use of the four-letter word of your choice.

Stephens, R., Atkins, J., & Kingston, A. (2009). Swearing as a response to pain NeuroReport, 20 (12), 1056-1060 DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832e64b1

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Wednesday 8 July 2009 at 3:17 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Getting It Wrong, Health & Medicine

Scientists at Newcastle University claim to have created human sperm from embryonic stem cells for the first time. Professor Karim Nayernia who led the team says their research could be used to study male infertility, but the tabloids drew slightly different conclusions.

Ethical storm flares as British scientists create artificial sperm from human stem cells‘ and ‘Are we on the brink of a society without any need for men?‘ – Daily Mail

The end of men? Scientists create sperm in the lab out of stem cells‘ – The Mirror

Chaps doomed as lab grows sperm‘ – The Sun

I can’t access the paper thus only have the press release to go on, but even without an in-depth look at the science I can safely say that these headlines are a bit alarmist.

Theoretically, these artificial sperm could be used to fertilise an egg and produce a viable embryo, though such a procedure is currently banned in the UK by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. Laws do change however, and Professor Nayernia and his team have already used the technique to impregnate mice, though the resulting offspring died soon after birth due to abnormalities.

It’s still a huge leap to go from creating sperm to eliminating men all together. For one thing, surely half of all babies born through this method would be male? Even if this weren’t the case, the researchers were not able to produce viable sperm from female stem cells. It seems that men will need to stick around, if only for their Y chromosome.

Ultimately I think that the furthest this research will go is to generate artificial sperm from the stem cells of men who can’t produce their own. We’re not even close to that yet though, and many media reports mention rival scientists questioning whether the team at Newcastle have even created sperm at all. Dr Allan Pacey of the University of Sheffield and Secretary of the British Fertility Society told the Guardian:

“As a sperm biologist of 20 years’ experience, I am unconvinced from the data presented in this paper that the cells … produced by Professor Nayernia’s group can be accurately called ’spermatozoa’”

Whilst it is important that we have a debate about the implications of this research and create legislation reflecting the realities of science, I don’t think these headlines can be taken seriously. A dose of common sense will tell you that the majority of couples will choose to conceive in the same way as they have always done, men included, and this new technique will just be another addition to the IVF toolkit.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
3 Comments » Posted on Tuesday 7 July 2009 at 9:51 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology

ResearchBlogging.org

A common trope in science fiction: the hero is presented with two people of identical appearance, one a loyal ally and the other a dastardly villain. “Shoot him!” they both cry, “I’m the real one!”

It seems that this scenario is also played out in the natural world. A species of orb spider called Cyclosa mulmeinensis constructs decoy models of itself, in an effort to confuse predators. Ling Tseng and I-Min Tso of Tunghai University in Taiwan decided to investigate this behaviour, which they call a “Darwinian puzzle”, in a paper published in the journal Animal Behaviour.

For some animals, drawing attention to yourself works a defence, as long as you have the muscle to back it up. Wasps, the natural predator of the orb spider, advertise their stinger through their distinctive yellow and black markings. Anything that wants to feed on them know not to get involved, unless they want a nasty jab.

This explanation doesn’t make sense for C. mulmeinensis though, because it has no defences. Why encourage predator attention by offering the prospect of multiple meals if you can’t fight off an attack?

The obvious answer is that whilst having decoys increases the number of attacks on a spider’s web, less of them end up directed towards the actual spider itself. Biologists suspect this to be the case, but until now no-one had verified it in the wild. In July and August of 2003, 2004 and 2005 Tseng and Tso went to Orchid Island, 90km off the coast of Taiwan, to do just that.

C. mulmeinensis are found in abundance on the island. They build their webs hanging vertically, using webbing, eggsacs and remains of their prey to create decoy models of themselves. The image to the left shows decoys made from a) prey remains and b) eggsacs, with the spider marked by an arrow.

The researchers found the size of the decoys to be very closely related to the length of the spider who made them, implying that they were intentionally built to confuse predators. To investigate this further, they also looked at how light is reflected by both the spiders and their decoys. The results were surprisingly similar, so to the limited visual systems of the predatory wasps the decoys appear almost indistinguishable to the spiders.

Both spider and decoys show up in sharp contrast to background vegetation however, making them an easy target for the wasps. The scientists set up video cameras and found that the number of attacks on webs with two or more decoys was twice that of webs with one or no decoy.

This might make decoys sound like a poor strategy as they led to increased attacks, but most of these were made against the decoys and not the spider. Whilst the arachnid might be attracting more attention, it can often redirect it and escape without harm, leaving the unfortunate wasp empty-handed and with an empty stomach.

Tseng, L., & I-Min Tso, . (2009). A risky defence by a spider using conspicuous decoys resembling itself in appearance Animal Behaviour DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.017

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
3 Comments » Posted on Tuesday 7 July 2009 at 7:17 pm by Sam Wong
In Biology

As many newspapers reported last Friday, a study by Professor Ian Coulson of Imperial College has suggested that climate change is to blame for a decrease in the size of wild sheep in the Outer Hebrides.

The average weight of Soay sheep on the island of Hirta has fallen by about 5 per cent in the last 24 years. After studying a wealth of data on the body sizes and life histories of the sheep, the researchers concluded that global warming is the culprit. According to Prof Coulson, smaller lambs that normally struggle to survive through winter now have a better chance of making it to spring as conditions have been getting milder. Consequently, a greater number of small sheep are reproducing, and propagating their genes for small bodies.

I haven’t been able to access the paper (published in Science Express), so the best description I have of how the authors reached this conclusion comes from  the BBC:

They used a formula called the “Price equation”, which was designed by evolutionary theorist George Price to predict how a physical trait, such as body size, will change from one generation to the next.

With all of this data, the team was able to “rearrange the equation” and use it to work out how much of a contribution each driver made to the sheep’s body size.

They found that the local environment had a stronger effect on the animals than the evolutionary pressure to grow larger.

A press release put out by Imperial College reads:

Their results suggest that the decrease in average body size seen in Hirta’s sheep is primarily an ecological response to environmental changes over the last 25 years; evolutionary change has contributed relatively little.

This statement seems to underlie a bit of confusion in the press about what sort of effect we’re looking at here. If we accept Prof Coulson’s conclusion, then clearly the decrease in body size is an ecological response to environmental changes. But is it not an evolutionary change as well? Evolution boils down to a change in allele frequencies in a population (alleles being the different variants of a particular gene). If a larger number of smaller lambs are reaching reproductive maturity and passing on their genes for small bodies, then what we’re seeing is a weakening of the selection pressure in favour of larger bodies, leading to genes for small bodies becoming more numerous in the population.

Yet many reports implied that natural selection is not at play here. The Times said this:

The scientists attributed the change to short-term changes in climate rather than to the long-term pressures of natural selection, which would favour a larger — not a smaller — body size.

The Independent went as far as to publish a subtitle heralding ‘Darwinism turned on its head’.

The Telegraph led with a strong contender for 2009’s worst opening sentence in a science article (I welcome further nominations in the comment thread).

Survival of the fittest and natural selection usually means that species grow bigger as they evolve

It really doesn’t bode well when the article starts with a howler like that.

These misinterpretations notwithstanding, the Soay sheep study has elucidated a fairly benign effect of climate change on ecology. But the rate at which the planet is heating up means that many animals may not be able to evolve quickly enough to cope with the changes in their environment. According to the IPCC, between a fifth and a third of all species could be at risk of extinction by the end of the century as a result of global warming.

We can expect to read more stories about climate change shaping evolution in the coming years, no doubt including some that elements of the media construe as anti-Darwinian. But the likelihood is that these will be outnumbered by sad tales of species disappearing altogether.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Monday 6 July 2009 at 7:54 am by Jacob Aron
In Biology, Evolution, Getting It Wrong, Inventions & Technology, Psychology, Space & Astronomy, Weekly Roundup

Whoops. Wrote this yesterday but somehow failed to put it on the site. Warning: incoming link dump. I’ve still got loads of interesting stuff left, so I thought I’d burn it all off at once.

Honours for UK astronauts

The British Interplanetary Society (BIS) have created an award for people from the UK who have flown in to to space – all five of them.

The silver pins were give to Helen Sharman and Richard Garriott, who were backed by private funds, and Michael Foale, Nicholas Patrick and Piers Sellers who all became US citizens to fly with NASA.

Despite UK government resistance to human spaceflight, the BIS have made up another five pins that they hope to give to future UK astronauts.

One quarter of Londoners believe in creationism

The figure falls to one in seven nationwide, which is still fairly concerning. Worse though are the one in five Londoners who have never even heard of Darwin – you don’t have to believe the guy, but at least know his name!

US Navy is building electromagnetic plane guns

As in, guns that fire planes. Well not quite, but the Pentagon has spent half a billion dollars on building a new launch system for aircraft carriers.

Currently, they use “steam catapults” to launch planes off the short carrier runways – which is pretty much what it sounds like. The new Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System will instead use an electric linear motor to shoot the planes off in to the sky.

Self-help books don’t

A psychological study has found that self-help books can actually have the opposite effect to that intended. The research showed that people with low self-esteem actually feel worse about themselves after repeating typical self-help statements like “I am a lovable person”.

Monkeys barter and trade on a simian stock market

Instead of pounds or dollars, non-human primates use grooming as currency. Scientists from the University of Strasbourg in France examined monkey exchange rates by placing food in a box that only one female was trained to open.

An hour after she did, the other members of the group rewarded her with longer and more frequent grooming, and she reciprocated less.

Her new-found wealth wasn’t to last however. When the scientists introduced another trained monkey, the first female’s grooming “stock value” decreased as the second female’s rose. Eventually the “market” equalised and they were both groomed for the same amount of time.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Monday 29 June 2009 at 10:39 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Blocking the action of a gene called Sirtuin-1 reduced the symptoms of type 2 diabetes in rats, scientists have found.

People with Type 2 diabetes suffer from high blood glucose concentrations due to insulin resistance and increased glucose production. To create a similar condition in rats, the researchers put a group of rats on a four-week diet of high-fat, fructose-rich meals.

Sirtuin-1 is a gene responsible for regulating glucose production in the liver. The researchers therefore then blocked Sirtuin-1 in the ‘diabetic’ rats by injecting them with a fragment of genetic information. This fragment – called an antisense oligonucleotide – interrupts and blocks gene expression and can be targeted to specific genes.

After Sirtuin-1 inhibition, the rats were more sensitive and responsive to insulin. The rate of glucose production fell back to normal levels, resulting in a decrease in the blood plasma. Thus the scientists believe the Sirtuin-1 gene is a cause of type 2 diabetes symptoms.

The results of this study are consistent with a recent mouse study which showed that decreased expression of Sirtuin-1 led to better insulin sensitivity. The next step is to develop inhibitors targeted to Sirtuin-1 in the liver, these will be tested in rats before moving on to primates and human clinical trials if successful.

For more information on animal research and this story, please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Monday 29 June 2009 at 10:18 pm by Emma Stokes
In Biology, Health & Medicine

Using fish, scientists have discovered a signalling pathway that could be used to treat skin cancers (melanomas). The pathway, PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase) had a major effect on the progression of cancerous melanomas in zebrafish. Zebrafish are ideal for studying skin cancer as the melanomas are similar to those seen in humans, and the fish themselves are easy to observe because of their light-coloured, almost transparent skin.

Signalling pathways regulate cell division, migration and death. The pathways form a complex network to relay these various commands to cells. But when the signalling molecules mutate, the result is often excess cell division which can lead to cancer.

The team looked at two major pathways called Ras and PI3K. They found fish often developed melanomas which progressed rapidly if molecules in these pathways were mutated. The discovery that PI3K was directly involved indicates that it could be a suitable target for melanoma therapy.

The mutant zebrafish also passed on the mutations to their offspring. In this they were strikingly similar to the human inherited syndrome FAMM (familial atypical mole and melanoma).

This study highlights a potential target for therapy, but also gives scientists new insights into the mechanisms of melanomas, revealing other possible targets. But further research into these models will be needed so scientists can see whether they’re as promising as this initial study indicates.

For more information on animal research and this story, please see the Understanding Animal Research site.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Thursday 25 June 2009 at 4:25 pm by Jessica Bland
In Biology, Getting It Right

Despite appearances, here at Just A Theory, we don’t spend all our time trying to bash the media’s representation of science. Sometimes we try to join in. This week I even managed to get something published internationally (hurray!): here is my short article in The Economist.

It’s on recent research that shows that dinosaurs were not as big as we thought. In the spirit of Just A Theory, I try to go beyond the “Jurassic Park was wrong” story and explain, with the help of one of the research’s authors, a little bit about what they say in the actual paper. Leave a comment if you can – it only takes a second to register on The Economist website. It would be great to know whether people really want to know more than just whether Brachiosaurus weighed the same as three or seven African elephants…

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
Post A Comment » Posted on Tuesday 23 June 2009 at 7:47 pm by Jacob Aron
In Biology

If you want someone to pay attention, speak to their right-hand side. That’s the advice of scientists Luca Tommasi and Daniele Marzoli from the University “Gabriele d’Annunzio” Italy. They performed a series of three studies, published in the online journal Naturwissenschaften that found humans are more likely to act on a request to their right ear rather than their left.

Unfortunately this is one of those occasions where I am not able to read the paper, which is a shame because it actually sounds quite interesting, as it involved scientists going clubbing.

It seems that laboratory studies have already determined a right ear dominance, thought to be a result of the superior verbal processing of the left brain hemisphere which controls the right side of the body. In order to confirm these results in a real life environment, Tommasi and Marzoli hit the nightclubs.

The first study involved simply observation. They watched 286 clubbers involved in conversations over the loud music, and found that 72% used their right ear when listening.

In the next study, the researchers got involved. Stepping out on to the dancefloor, they went up to 160 clubbers and mumbled inaudible nonsense, waiting for their victim to turn their head and offer a particular ear. The researchers then covered their tracks by asking for a cigarette. The results showed that 58% offered their right ear, but only women had a consistent right-ear preference.

The final study saw the scientists intentionally addressing 176 clubbers in a particular ear. This time they didn’t mumble, instead directly asking for a cigarette. In the previous study, where the clubber chose which ear to offer, there was no link between the likelihood of being given a cigarette and the ear involved. With this more direct approach, the researchers found they were significantly more likely to receive a cigarette when addressing the person’s right ear.

I’ve got this wonderful (if rather stereotypical) image of lab-coated scientists running up to clubbers and whispering in their ears, all the while clutching clipboards. I’m sure it wasn’t quite like that, but it must have been fun for Tommasi and Marzoli to put in a funding request for a night on the town.

In all seriousness though, this is an interesting result because it shows once again the strange split in the two sides of our brain. This, say the authors, is one of the few studies to clearly demonstrate this difference in an everyday environment.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
24 Comments » Posted on Monday 22 June 2009 at 12:03 pm by Sam Wong
In Biology, Climate Change & Environment

David Mitchell, as usual, wrote a very funny but also very wise column in the Observer yesterday about the Daily Mail’s ridiculous wheelie bin campaign, and about how our heightened sensitivity to injustices against us has overridden our sense of responsibility to society.

Our fear of being encroached upon has made us forget that there are few freedoms that can be fully exercised without impinging on someone else’s. The freedom to stab has long since been subordinated to the freedom not to be stabbed. But we still have the freedom not to recycle and to borrow or lend money recklessly, regardless of others’ freedom to live on a habitable planet and in a functional economy. We’ve hugely prioritised our rights over our duties because it’s only the former that tyrants try to take away.

A reader called Memoid posted a comment saying:

There’s not even been a hint of discussion about the right to have children yet, and that’s the debate we really need to have. And the world needs the vast majority of us to lose the debate.

He’s right, so let’s start the debate. There are 6.8 billion people on the planet. At the current rate, there will be 9.1 billion by 2050. Most of the increase will happen in developing countries, but even Britain’s population is expected to increase by 16 million in that time. And yet you rarely hear anyone talk about whether everyone can continue to have as many children as they like.

The Earth simply cannot provide enough food, energy and resources for that many people. And just think about the impact on the climate. How can we expect to make dramatic cuts in our carbon emissions if our population continues to grow?

People need to see having lots of children as the environmental sin that it is. You can turn all your lights off, cycle to work and insulate your house but having kids makes you more of an eco-criminal than the childless bloke next door who drives a gas-guzzler and takes 10 flights a year.

The idea of limiting one’s procreative activities will be very difficult for many to accept, for Darwinian as well as societal reasons. Surely having children is the most sacred of all human rights? I’m not advocating any government intervention in how big a family people choose to have. But I think the public needs to be more aware of the seriousness of the environmental ramifications of having children. Perhaps then more people might realise that this is one instance when our duty to society should take precedence over exercising our rights.

The Optimum Population Trust, of which David Attenborough became patron in April, runs a ‘Stop At Two’ campaign, a